Table 6

ANOVA results for perceived performance and motivation to comply in the child scenario

Perceived performance/opinion of reference groupSignificance of mean differencesHomogeneity of variancesPost hoc comparisons for mean differences (p Value)
F valuep ValueED–GPDSED–GPHVED–PDGPDS–GPHVGPDS–PDGPHV–PD
Explanation27.6000.0000.000*0.42 (0.003)0.10 (0.880)−0.78 (0.000)−0.32 (0.095)−1.20 (0.000)−0.89 (0.000)
Immediate technical examination53.4330.0000.041*1.22 (0.000)1.34 (0.000)0.22 (0.345)0.12 (0.787)−1.00 (0.000)−1.12 (0.000)
Waiting time5.7110.0010.000*−0.61 (0.003)−0.13 (0.880)0.04 (0.995)0.48 (0.036)0.66 (0.001)0.17 (0.761)
Access16.2510.0000.000*0.84 (0.000)0.94 (0.000)0.95 (0.000)0.10 (0.920)0.11 (0.892)0.01 (0.999)
Payment43.3360.0000.000*1.22 (0.000)1.89 (0.000)2.01 (0.000)0.67 (0.004)0.79 (0.000)0.12 (0.930)
Partner/close family members7.6750.0000.004*0.34 (0.295)0.39 (1.99)−0.44 (0.111)0.04 (0.996)−0.78 (0.000)−0.83 (0.000)
Friends/other family members4.9980.0020.000*0.21 (0.682)0.20 (0.701)−0.43 (0.109)−0.01 (0.999)−0.64 (0.004)−0.63 (0.005)
  • ANOVA, analysis of variance; ED, emergency department; GPDS, general practitioner deputizing services; GPHV, GP home visit; PD, paediatrician.

  • Applied post hoc test: *Dunnett C.