Questions and interpretation of results of the graphical modelling
| Question | Interpretation of result | |
| 1 | Was a lower score associated with making the dimension a priority? | Yes, it did significantly for four dimensions, use of guidelines (p=0.005), clinical information (p=0.016), prescribing (p=0.035) and patient information (p=0.046) out of 11, and one other, significant events (p=0.078) approached significance |
| 2 | Is prioritising associated with change? | No evidence for this |
| 3 | Does intervention between meetings lead to change? | There was evidence for this in two dimensions, patient information (p=0.025) and significant events (p=0.044) |
| 4 | Does the anticipation of interventions between meetings affect prioritising? | There was evidence for this in two out of 11 dimensions, use of guidelines (p=0.015) and patient information (p=0.048) |
| 5 | Is practice size associated with prioritising? | No evidence for this |
| 6 | Is size associated with change? | No evidence for this |