Relative contribution of each tempo to the five main classes of adverse events
| Nature of adverse events | Series of 623 files of tempo-related events | |||||
| GPs' access to knowledge (%) | Disease tempo (%) | Office tempo (%) | Patient tempo (%) | Out-office coordination tempo (%) | Total | |
| Missed or delayed diagnosis | 30.7 | 51.9 | 4.2 | 6.8 | 19.7 | 113.3 |
| Adverse drug events | 57.1 | 33.3 | 6.0 | 19.0 | 31.0 | 146.4 |
| Poor strategic of care, inadequate treatment, surveillance | 29.9 | 43.3 | 7.5 | 17.2 | 27.6 | 125.4 |
| Ethics, conflict management, and miscellaneous | 4.1 | 6.8 | 50.0 | 20.3 | 23.0 | 104.1 |
| Falls/device and care-induced traumas | 52.2 | 11.9 | 28.4 | 20.9 | 4.5 | 117.9 |
Since the coding scheme was permitting the combination of two contributive tempos, the sum of tempos for a given class of adverse event is always more than 100%. The closer the total to 100%, the more the considered adverse event has resulted from only one tempo (for instance the missed or delayed diagnosis). Conversely, the greater the sum, the more the adverse event has resulted from associations of tempos.