Regular Article
Collectivism, Individualism, and Cohesion in a Team-Based Occupation

https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1768Get rights and content

Abstract

Cultural individualism, collectivism, and cohesion have been researched primarily on a national level. This exploratory study used a grounded theory research design and ethnographic interview methodology to investigate these concepts on an occupational level. Integrating social influence and social identity theories, research questions were generated and examined empirically. Different groups of computer programmers were observed to display individualism or collectivism, indicating the possibility that individualism and collectivism might exist on an occupational level as well as on a national level. In addition, cultural cohesion was identified as a separate construct from collectivism. This research suggests a framework for further empirical study, along with a set of research propositions about individualism, collectivism, and cultural cohesion on an occupational level.

References (54)

  • E. Cashdan

    Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power

    Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

    (1998)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • J.W. Creswell

    Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.

    (1998)
  • G. Ebadan et al.

    Downsizing, delayering and careers—The survivor's perspective

    Human Resource Management Journal

    (1997)
  • L.T. Eby et al.

    Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    (1997)
  • B. Ekberg

    Go ahead, bring the office home

    Consumer Technology

    (1997)
  • D. Gefin et al.

    Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model

    MIS Quarterly

    (1997)
  • B. Glaser et al.

    The discovery of grounded theory

    (1967)
  • E.L. Harrison et al.

    Using team building to change organizational culture

    Organization Development Journal

    (1997)
  • M.R. Heald et al.

    Formal and emergent predictors of coworkers' perceptual congruence on an organization's social structure

    Human Communication Research

    (1998)
  • Herman, A. 1999. Report on CNN, Headline News,...
  • P. Herriet et al.

    Facilitating new deals

    Human Resource Management Journal

    (1997)
  • G. Hofstede

    Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values

    (1980)
  • G. Hofstede

    Identifying organizational subcultures: An empirical approach

    Journal of Management Studies

    (1998)
  • F. Hopfl

    The making of the corporate acolyte: Some thoughts on charismatic leadership and the reality of organizational commitment

    Journal of Management Studies

    (1992)
  • R.D. Iverson et al.

    Turnover culture in the hospitality industry

    Human Resource Management Journal

    (1997)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Current status of CSR practices in the casino industry: A comparison between the U.S. and Macau

      2021, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, Macau casinos tend to use the terms team and team members more than employees. This differentiation may correspond to the cultural difference between Western (e.g., U.S.) and Eastern (e.g., Macau) organizations (Workman, 2001). Individualism vs. collectivism is one of the most typical cultural differences between the West and the East (Hofstede, 1980).

    • Collectivist culture as a determining of organizational performance through human resource practices

      2013, Investigaciones Europeas de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text