Conclusions: Fixing the NRO
There is no clear consensus on what needs to be done to “fix” the NRO, nor a consensus that it needs fixing at all. In 2000, several high-level studies were conducted that concerned aspects of the NRO. Some of the suggestions— such as increasing the status and power of the NRO Director within the defense bureaucracy— seem relatively minor, but may help clarify the purpose of the organization. Others, such as returning the NRO to its early Cold War roots, when it was extremely isolated and had relatively little oversight, seem to contradict the reality of increasing demand for NRO services and the completely different strategic environment of the post-Cold War world.
Former Guggenheim Fellow at the National Air and Space Museum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Day, D.A. (2004). Intelligence Space Program. In: Sadeh, E. (eds) Space Politics and Policy. Space Regulations Library Series, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48413-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48413-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0879-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48413-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive