Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy

Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An instrument for measuring patients’ preferences for two identified dimensions of autonomy, their desire to make medical decisions and their desire to be informed, was developed and tested for reliability and validity. The authors found that patients prefer that decisions be made principally by their physicians, not themselves, although they very much want to be informed. There was no correlation between patients’ decision making and information-seeking preferences (r=0.09; p=0.15). For the majority of patients, their desire to make decisions declined as they faced more severe illness. Older patients had less desire than younger patients to make decisions and to be informed (p<0.0001 for each comparison). However, only 19% of the variance among patients for decision making and 12% for information seeking could be accounted for by stepwise regression models using sociodemographic and health status variables as predictors. The conceptual and clinical implications of these findings are discussed. Key words: patient autonomy; decision making; survey research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient—practitioner relationship. Vol 2. Government Printing Office, 1982:2.

  2. Meisel A, Roth LH. What we do and do not know about informed consent. JAMA 1981;246:2473.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vertinsky IB, Thompson WA, Uyeno D. Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision-making. Health Serv Res 1974;9:121–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Strull WB, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision-making? JAMA 1984;252:2990–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krantz DS, Baum A, Wideman MV. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39:977–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pendleton L, House WC. Preferences for treatment approaches in medical care: college students versus diabetic outpatients. Med Care 1984;22:644–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lidz C, Meisel A. Informed consent and the structure of medical care. In: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavior Research. Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient—provider relationship. Vol. 2. Government Printing Office, 1982;317–410.

  8. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980;92:832–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faden RR, Becker C, Lewis C, Freeman J, Faden AI. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 1981;19:718–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris L, et al. Informed consent and the structure of medical care. In: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient—provider relationship. Vol. 2. Government Printing Office. 1982;17–316.

  11. Haug MR, Lavin B. Practitioner or patient—who’s in charge? J Health Soc Behav 1981;22:212–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulman BA. Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment. Med Care 1979;17:267–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brody DS. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med 1980;93:718–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:520–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes RB, Gibson ES, Hackett BC, et al. Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension. Lancet 1976;1:1265–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. United States Department of Commerce. The alphabetical index of industries and occupations. Government Printing Office, 1982.

  18. Nelson E, Conger B, Douglass R, et al. Functional health status levels of primary care patients. JAMA 1983;249:3331–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware Jr. JE, Snyder MK. Dimensions of patient attitudes regarding doctors and medical services. Med Care 1975;13:669–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ware Jr. JE. Methodological considerations in the selection of health status assessments procedures. In: Wenger NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J, eds. Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: LeJacq Publishing, 1984;87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Waitzkin H, Stoeckle JD. The communication of information about illness: clinical, sociological and methodological considerations. Adv Psychosomat Med 1982;96:110–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cross AW, Churchill LR. Ethical and cultural dimensions of informed consent: a case study and analysis. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:110–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross cultural research. Ann Intern Med 1978;242:344–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Inglefinger FJ, Arrogance. N Engl J Med 1980;303:1507–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Siegler M. Decision-making strategy for clinical—ethical problems in medicine. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:2178–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Childress JF. Who should decide?: paternalism in health care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982;59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cassell EJ. The function of medicine. Hastings Center Report, 1977;Dec:16–9.

  28. Szasz TS, Hollander MH. A contribution to the philosophy of medicine. The basic models of the doctor—patient relationship. Arch Intern Med 1956;97:585–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Siegler M. The physician—patient accommodation: a central event in clinical medicine. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:1899–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quill TE. Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:228–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Speeding EJ, Rose DN. Building an effective doctor—patient relationship: from patient satisfaction to patient participation. Soc Sci Med 1985;21:115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Childress JF. Who should decide?: paternalism in health care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982;148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Section of General Internal Medicine and the Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Supported by the National Fund for Medical Education, Grant 43/82B.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ende, J., Kazis, L., Ash, A. et al. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy. J Gen Intern Med 4, 23–30 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596485

Keywords

Navigation