Skip to main content
Log in

The actionable imaging report

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of a diagnostic imaging examination is to provide the referring provider with an actionable imaging report that can be used to impart information to determine optimal clinical management for the patient. An actionable imaging report not only conveys the findings of the examination accurately, but does so in a timely and safe manner for an imaging examination that was performed appropriately and using the correct technique. The use of information technology tools has been paramount in improving the value of the imaging report and continues to play a prominent role in this process. The diversity of abdominal imaging, in both the variety of imaging modalities available and the organ systems evaluated, makes it well-suited to adopt these information technology solutions to improve report quality, including increased consistency in reports and in follow-up recommendations. This review discusses the components of the imaging chain involved in optimizing the imaging report with specific emphasis on the role of information technology applications to address the challenges that are frequently encountered. Specific abdominal imaging examples are presented to provide practical guidance and clinical context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin DL (2011) Informatics in radiology: Measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics. Radiographics 31:1511–1527. doi:10.1148/rg.316105207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zafar HM, Mills AM, Khorasani R, Langlotz CP (2012) Clinical decision support for imaging in the era of the patient protection and affordable care act. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 9(907–918):e5. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.014

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ip IK, Schneider LI, Hanson R, et al. (2012) Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 9:129–136. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khorasani R (2001) Computerized physician order entry and decision support: improving the quality of care. Radiographics 21:1015–1018. doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl371015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, et al. (2006) Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 13:261–266. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M (2010) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 363:501–504. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1006114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Seshadri V, Hersh WR (2004) Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 11:95–99. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumenthal D (2010) Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med 362:382–385. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0912825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kruse CS, Goetz K (2015) Summary and frequency of barriers to adoption of CPOE in the U.S. J Med Syst 39:15. doi:10.1007/s10916-015-0198-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon EG, Blumenthal D, Jaggi T, et al. (2004) Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff 23:184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khorasani R, Hentel K, Darer J, et al. (2014) Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support for imaging: enabling evidence-based practice to improve quality and reduce waste. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:945–951. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khorasani R (2006) Clinical decision support in radiology: what is it, why do we need it, and what key features make it effective? J Am Coll Radiol JACR 3:142–143. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2005.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khorasani R (2010) Can radiology professional society guidelines be converted to effective decision support? J Am Coll Radiol JACR 7:561–562. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farias M, Jenkins K, Lock J, et al. (2013) Standardized clinical assessment and management plans (SCAMPs) provide a better alternative to clinical practice guidelines. Health Aff 32:911–920. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. OCEBM levels of evidence. In: CEBM. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  16. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Campbell EM, et al. (2007) Some unintended consequences of clinical decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 11:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shinagare AB, Ip IK, Raja AS, et al. (2015) Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis. Abdom Imaging 40:272–277. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0210-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Connor SD, Sodickson AD, Ip IK, et al. (2014) Journal Club: requiring clinical justification to override repeat imaging decision support: impact on CT use. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:W482–490. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ip IK, Gershanik EF, Schneider LI, et al. (2014) Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain. Am J Med 127(512–518):e1. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.024

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raja AS, Ip IK, Dunne RM, et al. (2015) Effects of performance feedback reports on adherence to evidence-based guidelines in use of CT for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a randomized trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunne RM, Ip IK, Abbett S, et al. (2015) Effect of evidence-based clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiographic imaging in hospitalized patients. Radiology 276:167–174. doi:10.1148/radiol.15141208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. (2003) Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 10:523–530. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Obey D (2009) H.R.1—111th congress (2009-2010): American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009. https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/1. Accessed 3 Nov 2015

  24. Pitts J (2014) Text—H.R.4302—113th congress (2013-2014): protecting access to Medicare Act of 2014. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4302/text/pl. Accessed 3 Nov 2015

  25. Harvard Medical School eLibrary of Evidence. http://libraryofevidence.med.harvard.edu/index.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  26. Khorasani R (2011) How IT tools can help improve current protocolling performance gaps. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 8:675–676. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. (2003) Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 348:1556–1564. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa020703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasser EJ, Galante NJ, Andriole KP, et al. (2013) Optimizing radiologist e-prescribing of CT oral contrast agent using a protocoling portal. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:1298–1302. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250. doi:10.1148/radiol.12121502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, et al. (2011) Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260:174–181. doi:10.1148/radiol.11101913

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbosa F, Maciel LMZ, Vieira EM, et al. (2010) Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clin São Paulo Braz 65:15–21. doi:10.1590/S1807-59322010000100004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Ferencik M, et al. (2013) Interpreting the interpretations: the use of structured reporting improves referring clinicians’ comprehension of coronary CT angiography reports. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 10:432–438. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.11.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weiss DL, Langlotz CP (2008) Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249:739–747. doi:10.1148/radiol.2493080988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Silveira PC, Dunne R, Sainani NI, et al. (2015) Impact of an information technology-enabled initiative on the quality of prostate multiparametric MRI reports. Acad Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.02.018

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sahni VA, Silveira PC, Sainani NI, Khorasani R (2015) Impact of a structured report template on the quality of MRI reports for rectal cancer staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:584–588. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.14053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weiss DL, Kim W, Branstetter BF, Prevedello LM (2014) Radiology reporting: a closed-loop cycle from order entry to results communication. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 11:1226–1237. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Radiology Reporting Templates|RadReport.org. http://radreport.org/. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  39. Metrics| Radiology Reporting Templates| RadReport.org. http://radreport.org/metrics.php. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  40. Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 26:1595–1597. doi:10.1148/rg.266065168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Adrenal Characterization. http://www.chestx-ray.com/index.php/calculators/adrenal-characterization. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  42. Iron, liver and MRI. http://www.radio.univ-rennes1.fr/Sources/EN/Hemo.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2015

  43. Abe H, Macmahon H, Shiraishi J, et al. (2004) Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 25:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Collins MJ, Hoffmeister J, Worrell SW (2006) Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 27:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R, et al. (2008) CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population. Radiology 247:133–140. doi:10.1148/radiol.2471070816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Viswanath S, Bloch N, Rofsky N, et al. (2008) A comprehensive segmentation, registration, and cancer detection scheme on 3 Tesla in vivo prostate DCE MRI. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv MICCAI 11:662–669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Health C for D and R Search for FDA Guidance Documents—Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff—Computer-Assisted Detection Devices Applied to Radiology Images and Radiology Device Data—Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submissions. http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm187249.htm. Accessed 3 Nov 2015

  48. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Hadjiiski LM, et al. (2009) Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists’ accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images. Acad Radiol 16:810–818. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Castellino RA (2005) Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview. Cancer Imaging 5:17–19. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0018

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Sistrom CL, Dreyer KJ, Dang PP, et al. (2009) Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology 253:453–461. doi:10.1148/radiol.2532090200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, et al. (2012) Factors associated with radiologists’ adherence to Fleischner Society guidelines for management of pulmonary nodules. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 9:468–473. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ip IK, Mortele KJ, Prevedello LM, Khorasani R (2012) Repeat abdominal imaging examinations in a tertiary care hospital. Am J Med 125:155–161. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.03.031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ip IK, Mortele KJ, Prevedello LM, Khorasani R (2011) Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists’ management recommendations. Radiology 259:136–141. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Boland GWL, Thrall JH, Gazelle GS, et al. (2011) Decision support for radiologist report recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 8:819–823. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 7:754–773. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Heilbrun ME, Remer EM, Casalino DD, et al. (2015) ACR appropriateness criteria indeterminate renal mass. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 12:333–341. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wall DJ, Javitt MC, Glanc P, et al. (2015) ACR appropriateness Criteria® infertility. Ultrasound Q 31:37–44. doi:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lacson R, Prevedello LM, Andriole KP, et al. (2014) Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:933–938. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Schiff GD, Puopolo AL, Huben-Kearney A, et al. (2013) Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med 173:2063–2068. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. National Patient Safety Goals| Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx. Accessed 2 Nov 2015

  61. Khorasani R (2005) Role and status of information technology solutions in radiology reporting. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 2:706–707. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2005.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lacson R, O’Connor SD, Sahni VA, et al. (2015) Impact of an electronic alert notification system embedded in radiologists’ workflow on closed-loop communication of critical results: a time series analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Connor SD, Dalal AK, Sahni VA, et al. (2015) Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up? J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Anik Sahni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahni, V.A., Khorasani, R. The actionable imaging report. Abdom Radiol 41, 429–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0679-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0679-x

Keywords

Navigation