Abstract
Background:
Performing laparoscopic surgery involves a complex cascade of cognitive skills, which may inherently have a constant technical error rate. We assess generic and specific minor and major error rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) performed by consultant surgeons.
Methods:
Checklists of generic (11) and specific technical minor (six) and major events (eight) were devised for LCs. Two experienced surgeons assessed each full-length operation blindly and independently.
Results:
A total of 37 LCs were performed by eight consultants. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications. Mean inter-rater reliability was κ = 0.91 (range 0.80–0.98) for each of the error categories. Error rates were generic (27/407) 6.6%, minor (59/222) 26.6%, and major (8/296) 2.7%, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference between the minor error group and the other groups, p ≤ 0.05.
Conclusions:
Performing laparoscopic surgery may always have a background technical error rate. Our present study demonstrates a migration of surgical technical errors in expert laparoscopic surgeons. The surgeons migrate technically when they execute a high rate of procedure-specific minor errors. However, when it comes to the major fundamental aspects of the operation, they dynamically adapt and migrate away from performing major technical errors. We aim to continue the study to increase cases, assess trainees as well, and also explore other factors that may affect the surgeon when executing surgical technical tasks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P Barach SD Small (2000) ArticleTitleReporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems Br. Med. J 320 759–763
R Berguer (1999) ArticleTitleSurgery and ergonomics Arch Surg 134 IssueID9 1011–1016 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1011 Occurrence Handle10487599
TA Brennan LL Leape NM Laird L Hebert AR Localio AG Lawthers JP Newhouse PC Weiler HH Hiatt (1991) ArticleTitleIncidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I N Engl J Med 324 370–376 Occurrence Handle1987460
DA Campbell SuffixJr SS Sonnad FE Eckhauser KK Campbell LJ Greenfield (2001) ArticleTitleBurnout among American surgeons Surgery 130 IssueID4 596–702 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2001.116676
P Davis R Lay-Yee R Briant W Ali A Scott S Schug (2002) ArticleTitleAdverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact NZ Med J 115 IssueID1167 U271
TR Eubanks RH Clements D Pohl N Williams DC Schaad S Horgan C Pellegrini (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy J Am Coll Surg 189 IssueID6 566–574 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00218-5 Occurrence Handle10589593
NK Francis GB Hanna A Cuschieri (2002) ArticleTitleThe performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study Arch Surg 137 IssueID7 841–844 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.137.7.841 Occurrence Handle12093343
TP Grantcharov L Bardram P Funch-Jensen J Rosenberg (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study Br Med J 323 IssueID7323 1222–1223
A Green HL Duthie HL Young TJ Peters (1990) ArticleTitleStress in surgeons Br J Surg 77 IssueID10 1154–1158 Occurrence Handle2224465
P Joice GB Hanna A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleErrors enacted during eridoscopic surgery—a human reliability analysis Appl Ergon 29 IssueID6 409–414 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00016-7 Occurrence Handle9796785
JA Martin G Regehr R Reznick H MacRae J Murnaghan C Hutchison M Brown (1997) ArticleTitleObjective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents Br J Surg 84 IssueID2 273–278 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x Occurrence Handle9052454
P Michel JL Quenon AM Sarasqueta Particlede O Scemama (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals Br. Med J 328 IssueID7433 199
K Moorthy Y Munz A Dosis S Bann A Darzi (2003) ArticleTitleThe effect of stress-inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task Surg Endosc 7 IssueID9 1481–1484
J Reason (1995) ArticleTitleUnderstanding adverse events: human factors Quality Health Care 4 80–89
RA Shapiro (1972) ArticleTitleNoise in the operating room N Engl J Med 287 1236–1237 Occurrence Handle5084988
NJ Taffinder IC McManus Y Gul RC Russell A Darzi (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopy simulator Lancet 352 IssueID9135 1191 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(98)00034-8 Occurrence Handle9777838
EJ Thomas DM Studdert HR Burstin EJ Orav T Zeena EJ Williams et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIncidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado Med Care 38 261–271 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003 Occurrence Handle10718351
C Vincent G Neale M Woloshynowych (2001) ArticleTitleAdverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review Br. Med J 322 517–519
RM Wilson WB Runciman RW Gibberd BT Harrison L Newby JD Hamilton (1995) ArticleTitleThe Quality in Australian Health Care Study Med J Aust 163 IssueID9 458–471 Occurrence Handle7476634
www.jchst.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarker, S.K., Chang, A., Vincent, C. et al. Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons. Surg Endosc 19, 832–835 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9174-5