Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Attempts to Educate Patients about Lower Endoscopy: A Narrative Review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patient knowledge about lower endoscopy might have beneficial effects on satisfaction outcomes, pre-procedure anxiety, and adherence, although this is poorly understood. Methods Searching the national and international literature, we reviewed 20 years of observational studies and randomized trials that examine possible relationships between educating patients about lower endoscopy and clinical outcomes. Twenty-three publications were included but their heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses. Standard and modified informed consent procedures and enhanced educational interventions were associated most often with levels of patient knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety, and adherence. Regardless of the approach, a large proportion of patients have poor comprehension of lower endoscopy’s risks, benefits, and alternatives; patient satisfaction with information and procedures manifests ceiling effects; only a subset of patients have clinically significant pre-procedure anxiety; and providing written information and reminders may improve procedure adherence. Future work should focus on strategies for improving patient knowledge in the setting of initial screening colonoscopy within open access systems. Patient knowledge of lower endoscopy is often inadequate even though greater knowledge might be associated with better clinical outcomes for certain patient subgroups. Professional societies have an important role to play in endorsing educational strategies and in clarifying and assessing the adequacy of patient knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerstenberger, P. D., & Plumeri, P. A. (1993). Malpractice claims in gastrointestinal endoscopy: analysis of an insurance industry data base. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 39, 132–138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayberry, M. K., & Mayberry, J. F. (2001). Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 13, 1467–1476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Basson, M. D., Gomez, R., Fishman, L., & Panzini, L. (2004). Informed consent for screening sigmoidoscopy in a Veterans Administration population. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 47, 1939–1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeoman, A. D., Dew, M. J., Das, L., & Rajapaksa, S. (2006). Role of cognitive function in assessing informed consent for endoscopy. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82, 65–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agre, P., Kurtz, R. C., & Krauss, B. J. (1994). A randomized trial using videotape to present consent information for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 40, 271–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luck, A., Pearson, S., Maddern, G., & Hewett, P. (1999). Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge: a randomised trial. Lancet, 354, 2032–2035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw, M. J., Beebe, T. J., Tomshine, P. A., Adlis, S. A., & Cass, O. W. (2001). A randomized, controlled trial of interactive, multimedia software for patient colonoscopy education. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 32, 142–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Proctor, D. D., Price, J., Minhas, B. S., Gumber, S. C., & Christie, E. M. (1999). Patient recall and appropriate timing for obtaining informed consent for endoscopic procedures. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 94, 967–971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Denberg, T. D., Coombes, J. M., Byers, T. E., Marcus, A. C., Feinberg, L. E., Steiner, J. F., et al. (2006). Effect of a mailed brochure on appointment-keeping for screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145, 895–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vila, J. J., Jimenez, F. J., Inarrairaegui, M., Prieto, C., Nantes, O., & Borda, F. (2006). Informed consent document in gastrointestinal endoscopy: understanding and acceptance by patients. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas, 98, 101–111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elfant, A. B., Korn, C., Mendez, L., Pello, M. J., & Peikin, S. R. (1995). Recall of informed consent after endoscopic procedures. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 38, 1–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearson, S., Maddern, G. J., & Hewett, P. (2005). Interacting effects of preoperative information and patient choice in adaptation to colonoscopy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 48, 2047–2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bassi, A., Brown, E., Kapoor, N., & Bodger, K. (2002). Dissatisfaction with consent for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Digestive Diseases, 20, 275–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Staff, D. M., Saeian, K., Rochling, F., Narayanan, S., Kern, M., Shaker, R., et al. (2000). Does open access endoscopy close the door to an adequately informed patient? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 52, 212–217.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan, J., Roufeil, L., Kaushik, S., & Bassett, M. (1998). Influence of coping style and precolonoscopy information on pain and anxiety of colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 48, 119–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dougall, A., Russell, A., Rubin, G., & Ling, J. (2000). Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 53–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahajan, R. J., Agrawal, S., Barthel, J. S., & Marshall, J. B. (1996). Are patients who undergo open-access endoscopy more anxious about their procedures than patients referred from the GI clinic? American Journal of Gastroenterology, 91, 2505–2508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aabakken, L., Baasland, I., Lygren, I., & Osnes, M. (1997). Development and evaluation of written patient information for endoscopic procedures. Endoscopy, 29, 23–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abuksis, G., Mor, M., Segal, N., Shemesh, I., Morad, I., Plaut, S., et al. (2001). A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 96, 1786–1790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanius, M., Zimmermann, P., Heegewaldt, H., Hohn, M., Fischer, M., & Rohde, H. (1990). [Does an information booklet on gastrointestinal endoscopy reduce anxiety for these examinations? Results of a randomized study with 379 patients]. Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie, 28, 651–655.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, M. P., Ebert, C. C., Sloan, T., Spanier, J., Bansal, A., Howden, C. W., et al. (2004). Patient anxiety and elective gastrointestinal endoscopy. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 38, 35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Millar, K., Jelicic, M., Bonke, B., & Asbury, A. J. (1995). Assessment of preoperative anxiety: Comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 74, 180–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarason, I., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.) (1975). Stress and anxiety (pp. 361–378). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

  24. Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 345–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tibble, J. A., Forgacs, I., Bjarnason, I., & Przemioslo, R. (2000). The effects of a preassessment clinic on nonattendance rates for day-case colonoscopy. Endoscopy, 32, 963–965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980). Informed consent—why are its goals imperfectly realized? New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 896–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrow, G. R. (1980). How readable are subject consent forms? JAMA, 244, 56–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Glabman, M. (2004). The top ten malpractice claims [and how to minimize them]. Hospitals & Health Networks, 78, 60–62, 64–66, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weeks, W. B., Foster, T., Wallace, A. E., & Stalhandske, E. (2001). Tort claims analysis in the Veterans Health Administration for quality improvement. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 29, 335–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahajan, R. J., & Marshall, J. B. (1997). Prevalence of open-access gastrointestinal endoscopy in the United States. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 46, 21–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Braddock, C. H. 3rd, Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L., & Levinson, W. (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice: Time to get back to basics. JAMA, 282, 2313–2320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Waye, J. D., Kahn, O., & Auerbach, M. E. (1996). Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 6, 343–377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jimison, H. B., Sher, P. P., Appleyard, R., & LeVernois, Y. (1998). The use of multimedia in the informed consent process. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 245–256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Segarajasingam, D. S., Pawlik, J., & Forbes, G. M. (2007). Informed consent in direct access colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 22(12), 2081–2085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brooks, A. J., Hurlstone, D. P., Fotheringham, J., Gane, J., Sanders, D. S., & McAlindon, M. E. (2005). Information required to provide informed consent for endoscopy: An observational study of patients' expectations. Endoscopy, 37(11), 1136–1139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas D. Denberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coombes, J.M., Steiner, J.F., Bekelman, D.B. et al. Clinical Outcomes Associated with Attempts to Educate Patients about Lower Endoscopy: A Narrative Review. J Community Health 33, 149–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-007-9081-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-007-9081-5

Keywords

Navigation