Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 52, Issue 7, April 2001, Pages 1123-1134
Social Science & Medicine

Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00212-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The objective of this study was to measure the independent effects of clinical factors and non-clinical factors, such as provider and sociodemographic characteristics, on the number of antenatal visits made by women in England and Wales. The study was based on a survey of the secondary case records of 20,771 women with singleton pregnancies who were delivered between 1 August 1994 and 31 July 1995. The women in the survey attended one of nine maternity units in Northern England and North Wales selected within those areas to reflect geographical variations, as well as variations in the size and teaching status of the institution. A multivariate Poisson regression model was developed to examine differences in the number of antenatal visits made by women with different clinical and non-clinical characteristics.

After controlling for non-clinical factors, primiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 1.0% more visits than primiparous women identified as low risk at booking (p=0.196). Multiparous women identified as high risk at booking made 3.5% more visits than their low risk counterparts (p<0.001). High risk-defining criteria during antenatal care led to a 0.3% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst primiparous women (p<0.001) and a 0.4% weekly increase in the number of antenatal visits amongst multiparous women (p<0.001). Several notable results, not reported elsewhere in the literature, were revealed by the regression analyses. After all independent variables were controlled for, women who were booked into urban teaching hospitals made 10% fewer antenatal visits than the women who were booked into the urban non-teaching hospitals. Women of Pakistani origin made 9.1% fewer antenatal visits than women of white British origin. Similar results were revealed for women of Indian origin and women from other ethnic groups. Non-smokers made 6.0% more antenatal visits than smokers. The planned pattern of antenatal care, number of carers seen, gestation at first presentation and maternal age also had significant independent impacts on the number of antenatal visits. The study highlights the sizeable impact of non-clinical factors on the antenatal care delivery process and indicates ways in which variations in antenatal care might be reduced.

Introduction

Every year over 650,000 pregnant women in England and Wales receive some form of antenatal care (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, 1996). This can be defined as the care of pregnant women by one or more professional group including obstetricians, midwives and general practitioners. Its purpose is to monitor the health of pregnant women and their unborn babies, advise, educate, reassure and provide treatment if appropriate. Antenatal care is still considered essential to the health of mother and baby. However, many current antenatal care practices are not evidence-based. Current provision has arisen historically and does not necessarily reflect the needs of the population (Oakley, 1982).

In the 1920s, Dame Janet Campbell introduced a fixed pattern of antenatal visits, with women being seen every four weeks until the 28th week of pregnancy, every two weeks until the 36th week and weekly thereafter. A higher standard of living, better education and wider reproductive choice means that women, in general, have less obstetric risk than previously. Hall, Chng & MacGillivray (1980) questioned established patterns of antenatal care and recommended a new pattern of eight routine visits for ‘normal’ primiparae and five for normal multiparae. However, this view has not gone unchallenged. Concern has been expressed that fewer antenatal visits may cause a delay in the detection of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disease, with its significant risks to mother and baby (Redman, 1982). Whilst routine antenatal screening for hypertensive disorders before 28 weeks gestation may have a low productivity in terms of the number of positive diagnoses per visit, it has great potential in terms of prevention of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality (Wallenburg, 1989).

Five prospective randomised controlled trials have compared a reduced schedule of antenatal visits with an existing schedule (Binstock & Wolde-Tsadik, 1995; McDuffie, Beck, Bischoff, Cross & Orleans, 1996; Munjanja, Lindmark & Nystrom, 1996; Sikorski, Wilson, Clement, Das & Smeeton, 1996; Walker & Koniak-Griffin, 1997). A recent systematic review of these trials (Khan-Neelofur, Gulmezoglu & Villar, 1998) revealed that no significant differences were observed in the two arms of the trials when low birthweight, small for gestational age, caesarean section, induction of labour, antepartum haemorrhage and postpartum haemorrhage were considered as outcome measures. The trials provided conflicting evidence concerning the impact of a reduced schedule of antenatal visits on preterm delivery. Three of the trials demonstrated a tendency towards an increased rate of preterm delivery in the reduced schedule group (Binstock & Wolde-Tsadik, 1995; McDuffie et al., 1996; Walker & Koniak-Griffin, 1997). Conversely, the largest trial, which was conducted in Harare, Zimbabwe (Munjanja et al., 1996), demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in preterm delivery in the reduced schedule group (relative risk=0.88, 95% confidence interval=0.80, 0.96). When perception of care was addressed, Sikorski et al. (1996) showed that women tend to be more dissatisfied with fewer antenatal visits as a result of increased worries about fetal well-being. Three trials also revealed the widespread dissatisfaction with the quality of reduced visiting schedules (Binstock & Wolde-Tsadik, 1995; McDuffie et al., 1996; Sikorski et al., 1996).

During the 1990s, greater emphasis has been placed on woman-centred care. Both the Changing Childbirth Report (Department of Health, England and Wales, 1993) and the report by the Audit Commission (Audit Commission, 1997) recommended that antenatal care should be tailored to meet the specific needs of women. The report by the Audit Commission, in addition, emphasised the need for antenatal care to be cost-effective and postulated that £10 million of savings could be made if antenatal care in England and Wales reflected the needs of women rather than historically-determined patterns.

In order to tailor antenatal care to the specific needs of women, a clearer understanding is required of the factors that currently influence the care delivery process. The limited evidence that is available suggests that the level of antenatal care may be influenced by a range of clinical and non-clinical factors (Tucker et al., 1994; Sanders, Somerset, Jewell & Sharp, 1999). The study reported in this paper uses a recently collected data set to identify, for the first time, the independent effects of clinical factors and non-clinical factors, such as provider and sociodemographic characteristics, on the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales. In so doing, it illustrates the dynamics involved in the delivery and consumption of antenatal care, and highlights specific problems that may need to be tackled if a woman-centred approach to care is to be achieved.

Section snippets

Data

This study uses the data from a survey of the secondary case records of antenatal care resources consumed by women (Vause & Maresh, 1999). The women in the survey attended one of nine maternity units in Northern England and North Wales selected within those areas to reflect geographical variations, as well as variations in the size and teaching status of the institution. The maternity units delivered between 200 and 6000 women annually. Care was taken to ensure that different management

Characteristics of women

A total of 20,771 women were included in the survey. An analysis of basic obstetric data revealed that women whose notes were missing, and therefore not included in the survey, did not experience more complicated pregnancies. Among women included in the survey, the mean concordance rate for the cases on which double-data entry was performed was 94.6%, with a mean number of 186 data items per case. All analyses were based on the 17,978 women for whom a complete record of antenatal care was

Discussion

This is the first study, to our knowledge, that examines the influence of clinical, provider and sociodemographic factors on the number of antenatal visits made by women in England and Wales. Although clinical criteria used to define the risk status of women had a considerable impact upon the number of antenatal visits, this study suggests a prominent role for provider and sociodemographic factors. The type of hospital at booking, the planned pattern of antenatal care, changes in care plans,

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff and patients of the hospitals involved in the survey. The participating hospitals were: Airedale Hospital, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Corbar Maternity Unit in Buxton, Glan Clwyd Hospital, North Manchester General Hospital, North Staffordshire Hospital, Northern General Hospital in Sheffield, Penrith Maternity Hospital, and Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport. We would also like to thank Peter Brocklehurst, Leslie Davidson and Jo Garcia for their comments on

References (34)

  • Department of Health. (1993). Changing childbirth: Report of the expert Maternity Group.London:...
  • J.A. Fleishmann et al.

    Longitudinal patterns of medical service use and costs among people with AIDS

    Health Services Research

    (1995)
  • M. Gready et al.

    Birth choicesWomen's expectations and experiences.

    (1995)
  • Hall, M.H., Chng, P.K., & MacGillivray, I. (1980). Is routine antenatal care worthwhile? Lancet, i,...
  • Hall, M.H., MacIntyre, S., & Porter, M. (1985). Antenatal care assessed (pp. 1108-119). Aberdeen: Aberdeen University...
  • Khan-Neelofur, D., Gülmezoglu, M., & Villar, J., for the WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group. (1998). Who should...
  • M. Klein et al.

    A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of careshared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit

    I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1983)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Reclaiming a moral identity: Stillbirth, stigma and 'moral mothers'

      2012, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      What sets late modernity apart from other societies is that the advice given to women by medics resides in the discourse of science and is thereby privileged by late modernity but such taboos are, arguably, a postmodern manifestation of those earlier strictures that were based in religion or superstition. Like many other societies, much of the advice given to pregnant women centres on the care they need to take with substances claimed to either harm or protect the fetus (Petrou et al., 2001). With regard to the ingestion or otherwise of particular substances, the expectation is that the pregnant woman will modify her behaviour.

    • Utilisation of antenatal care in four counties in Ningxia, China

      2011, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The research on the correlation between perceived health risks during pregnancy and number of antenatal care visits is quite limited. It has been showed that marital status, availability and accessibility of health services, the desirability of the pregnancy, and maternal age were associated with the number of antenatal visits (Magadi et al., 2000; Petrou et al., 2001; Myer and Harrison, 2003). The low coverage of women with adequate antenatal care might be due to their low socio-economic status and the lack of availability and accessibility to antenatal care services in the areas.

    • Ethnic differences in antenatal care use in a large multi-ethnic urban population in the Netherlands

      2011, Midwifery
      Citation Excerpt :

      A review of UK studies identified four studies, all revealing that women of Asian origin were more likely to book late for antenatal care as compared to white British women (Rowe and Garcia, 2003). A British study showed that women of Pakistani and Indian origin had almost 10% fewer antenatal visits than women of white British origin, independent of a number of specific risk factors (Petrou et al., 2001). They also were more likely to attend for antenatal care at a later gestational age than white women (Kupek et al., 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text