Auditing and the production of legitimacy
Section snippets
Structure, judgement and the legitimacy of the audit process
Despite programmes by firms and professional institutes to standardize the audit process, differences in the style and application of audit routines have been evident. Early research to characterize and explain these differences (e.g. Dirsmith & McAllister, 1982) crystallises the problem in terms of the difference between highly ‘structured’, formal approaches, and those that provide more space for individual judgement. Cushing and Loebbekke (1986) provide a content survey of audit approaches
The business of auditing
Auditing has always been a business. However, during the 1980s and 1990s the audit approaches of the large firms changed and evolved as the economics of auditing became more sensitive. Accordingly, the structure–judgement issue discussed above in terms of the managerial relations between the audit firm and its own members, is also in part about cost control and the management of audit as a business activity. McNair's (1991) study documents the ‘suppressed dilemma’ between cost and quality
Image management and working papers
Pentland's (1993) study provides an important contribution to our understanding of the social construction of the audit process. In essence, the argument is that macro-constructions of professionalism, auditor independence, and institutional trust in audit practice are accomplished, built up from, and reproduced by micro-interactions. As a team-based activity comprising ongoing interactions, auditing is a collective practice with important processual components. The study focuses on
Making new things auditable
The fourth and final substantive theme in this discussion concerns the extension of auditing practices to an increasing number of areas, something which has been evident in public sector administration in all developed countries (Power, 1994, Power, 1999), but which is particularly conspicuous as a ‘commonwealth’ effect in the UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. In essence, auditing has become a legitimate part of good management practice in a wide variety of domains. But if there is this
Discussion: the social construction of professional inference
Auditing is essentially an inferential practice, but there are different perspectives on the nature and quality of the inference process. The cognitive psychology approach, which dominates auditing research, concerns itself primarily with how auditors respond to cues in the environment, make decisions and perform techniques. Experimental studies investigate judgments in laboratory settings and examine the sources of stability and consensus of judgement over time and across different auditors. A
Producing legitimacy: some research issues
The introduction above hinted at some of the methodological issues raised by the papers reviewed, and the politics of auditing research within which they operate. Very few of these papers are really field studies and none is ethnographic in the anthropological sense of that term, despite Fogarty's (1996, p. 262) call for more ethnographic treatment of “The exchange processes that construct the transactional reality of regulation…”. A detailed discussion of the methodological strengths and
Conclusions: auditing and the production of legitimacy
Auditing practice can be regarded as a self-regulating system whose components (training programmes, professional standards, quality control sub-systems, disciplinary mechanisms) are an interacting, semi-institutionalized and loosely coupled whole, a structure that is constantly moving and subject to economic, regulatory and political pressures for change. This assembly of practices is pervaded by ideas about what auditing could and should be. Even at the level of technique and process
Acknowledgments
This paper was originally presented at the 25th anniversary conference for Accounting, Organizations and Society held in Oxford, July 2000. I would like to thank the Warden and Fellows of All Souls College, Oxford, where I was a visiting fellow in the Hilary and Trinity terms 2000, for providing the supportive environment within which this project was conceived. In addition, I gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom. I am
References (40)
- et al.
Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: an extended institutional theory perspective
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1993) - et al.
Materiality judgements and audit firm culture: socio-behavioral and political perspectives
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1994) - et al.
Inherent risk assessment and audit firm technology: a contrast in world theories
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1991) Real-izing the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: an interpretive field study
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1996)The imagery and reality of peer review in the US: insights from institutional theory
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1996)Auditing, hermeneutics and subjectivity
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1994)- et al.
Academic auditing research: an exploratory investigation into its usefulness
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(2001) Audit research—looking beyond North America
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(2001)- et al.
From techniques to ideologies: an alternative perspective on the audit function
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
(1990) Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behaviour
Accounting, Organizations and Society
(1991)
Getting comfortable with the numbers: auditing and micro-production of macro order
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Audit the taxpayer, not the return: tax auditing as an expression game
Accounting, Organizations and Society
From common sense to expertise: reflections on the pre-history of audit sampling
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Auditing, expertise and the sociology of technique
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Making things auditable
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Expertise and the construction of relevance: accountants and environmental audit
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Knowing efficiency: the enactment of efficiency in efficiency auditing
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Efficiency audit: an assembly of rationalities and programmes
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Organising the profession: a theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the UK
Accounting, Organizations and Society
Cited by (502)
Professional bodies and professional closure strategies: The field of auditing for small and medium-sized enterprises in Italy☆
2024, Critical Perspectives on AccountingRegulatory investigations, media coverage, and audit opinions
2024, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation‘A building of shame and disgrace’ or ‘trial by media’? Media framing of KPMG Netherlands’ head office
2024, Critical Perspectives on Accounting“He Hears”: An essay celebrating the 25 year anniversary of The Audit Society
2023, Critical Perspectives on AccountingNarratives of internal audit: The Sisyphean work of becoming “independent”
2023, Critical Perspectives on Accounting