CardiologyEffects of neural network feedback to physicians on admit/discharge decision for emergency department patients with chest pain☆,☆☆,★
Introduction
Rapid and accurate identification of low-risk emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain syndromes remains problematic.1., 2. Clinical and computer algorithms can successfully risk-stratify patients; however, they are not able to identify a group of patients at such low risk that they could be safely and immediately released from the ED.3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12.
A number of approaches have been developed to assist physicians in improving their diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction.8., 9., 13., 14., 15. It has been suggested that physicians will not use any method that purports to improve diagnostic accuracy unless it is easy to use and dramatically and consistently improves their performance.16., 17. Most approaches developed to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction have not met these requirements. Many of them have failed when applied in the field,17 in part because they depend on complete and accurate data to maintain optimum performance, which in real-time application is rarely possible.
The artificial neural network is a powerful modality for the recognition of complex patterns that can maintain accuracy when some input data are missing.10 The network maps a complex multidimensional space defined by the constellation of input information, characterizing patterns that are provided during training. During testing, the network determines the goodness of fit of unknown patterns to that mapped space. Network function allows for an infinite variability of input information weighting. It is thought that the network's ability to assign the weight given to a specific input variable being determined by the values of all other input variables is what enables it to perform more accurately than other statistical approaches.
A number of studies have revealed that the artificial neural network can accurately identify the presence of myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain.10., 11., 18., 19., 20., 21. The artificial neural network achieves better diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome than other widely accepted risk-stratification tools.22 Despite data showing the superiority of neural networks over other risk-stratification algorithms, they have yet to be used in “real time.” We sought to determine the impact of real-time artificial neural network use on ED chest pain patient disposition and physician decisionmaking.
Section snippets
Study design
We performed a before-and-after trial to assess the impact of neural network feedback on physician decisionmaking for ED patients with chest pain, as assessed by their admit/discharge decision. At the conclusion of the study, we queried physicians to assess their satisfaction and trust with the neural network.
Setting
Patients were enrolled at an urban, tertiary care hospital ED with an annual census of approximately 53,000 adult visits. The “before” portion of the study was conducted between July 1999
Results
There were 4,492 patient visits for whom data collection instruments were completed before implementation of the neural network. After neural network implementation, an additional 432 patient visits were evaluated. Patients in both portions of the study were generally similar with respect to demographic, historical, and other clinical characteristics used for computation by the neural networks (Table). Neural network outputs were produced for 100% of patients in the neural network phase of the
Limitations
There are several limitations to our study. Although patients in both portions of our trial appeared similar with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics at presentation, the group that presented after implementation of the neural network was less likely to sustain an acute myocardial infarction or have a discharge diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, which, however, should have biased the “after” group toward a lower admission rate.
We did not conduct a comprehensive instructional
Discussion
One of the strengths of the neural network is that its accuracy is not compromised when some input data are missing. Despite requiring more input data (and therefore being more likely to have occasional missing data), the neural network outperforms other risk-stratification algorithms, such as the Goldman and acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument algorithms, 11., 23. which makes it a potentially valuable tool in the ED, where the emergency physician rarely has access to
References (28)
- et al.
Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient
Ann Emerg Med
(1997) - et al.
A neural computational aid to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
Ann Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain
Ann Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
Prospective validation of artificial neural network trained to identify acute myocardial infarction
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
An artificial neural network system for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the accident and emergency department: evaluation and comparison with serum myoglobin measurements
Comp Methods Prog Biomed
(1997) - et al.
Serial VCG/ECG analysis using neural networks
Comput Biomed Res
(1998) The continuing search to identify the very-low-risk chest pain patient
Acad Emerg Med
(1999)- et al.
Missed diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department
N Engl J Med
(2000) - et al.
A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain
N Engl J Med
(1982) - et al.
A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain
N Engl J Med
(1988)
Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to emergency departments with acute chest pain
N Engl J Med
A predictive instrument to improve coronary care unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease
N Engl J Med
Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia
Ann Intern Med
An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from the National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group
Ann Emerg Med
Cited by (32)
A predictive analytics model for designing deep underground foundations using artificial neural networks
2023, Decision Analytics JournalPresentation of Coronary Artery Disease in a Chiropractic Clinic: A Report of 2 Cases
2016, Journal of Chiropractic MedicineCitation Excerpt :Undifferentiated chest pains from musculoskeletal sources are often overlooked.37,38 A large proportion of patients with chest pain who are admitted to hospital do not turn out to have acute coronary syndrome.39 Distinguishing whether a patient presenting with chest pain has acute coronary syndrome or a nonacute coronary syndrome is at best difficult.
Neural networks for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
2014, Revista Colombiana de CardiologiaModeling daily patient arrivals at Emergency Department and quantifying the relative importance of contributing variables using artificial neural network
2013, Decision Support SystemsCitation Excerpt :Thus, the structure of ANN is problem-specific. Thus far, ANN has appeared in many healthcare studies, such as diagnosing specific diseases by taking clinically relevant variables into account [8,9,26,27]. The “black box” characteristic of ANN gives rise to difficulty in quantifying the RI of input variables into output variables.
- ☆
Author contributions: JEH designed the study, developed the data collection instrument, oversaw all study-related procedures, wrote the first draft of the paper, and assisted with data analysis. KLS and DMS assisted with coordination of the data collection, performed data entry, and oversaw the day-to-day operations of the study. KLS, DMS, FDS, FSS, and WGB critically reviewed the manuscript. FDS, FSS, and WGB assisted with study design. FDS assisted with study design and development of the data collection instrument, coordinated the data collection and data entry, and performed patient follow-up in the hospital. FSS performed the statistical analysis. WGB designed the neural network and wrote sections of the manuscript. JEH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
- ☆☆
The authors report this study did not receive any outside funding or support.
- ★
Reprints not available from the authors.