ReviewMedical errors: impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas
Introduction
Patient safety is a current public and health care concern. It has received substantial attention following the release of two recent reports from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [1], [2]. Both of these reports have placed special emphasis on enhancing patient safety in today's health care system. Much of the problem in the provision of better and safer health care is a result of preventable adverse events due to medical errors [1]. We have previously highlighted some of the key concepts in medical error generation and have suggested a systems approach in medical error reduction [3]. Some specialties in health care are more prone to errors than others. The notability of surgical specialties with respect to the rate of adverse outcomes and errors in surgical practice has been outlined earlier [4]. The Quality of Australian Health Care Study (QAHCS) reported that more than half of all the adverse events recorded in the study were associated with a surgical operation [5]. The Harvard Medical Practice (HMP) Study II identifies certain sites of health care that are high-risk zones for patient safety [4]. In their analysis, the authors suggested that among other sites operating rooms, in-patient rooms, emergency rooms, and intensive care units were high-risk zones. The authors did not clearly delineate the adverse events occurring in the operating rooms and presumably these may be a result of either anesthetic or surgical interventions. However, the authors noted the low preventability of such incidents as compared to events occurring in other high-risk zones, such as emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs), where both preventability and the disability potential due to the adverse events are high [4]. It is these high-risk zones, where preventability of adverse events is high, that are prime areas of concern and are elaborated in greater detail. Apart from the specialties of emergency and intensive care medicine, which are highly interdependent on clinical laboratories, we have also reviewed the impact of errors in clinical diagnostic laboratories.
Section snippets
Clinical diagnostic laboratories
Laboratory reporting has a great influence on clinical decision making. With this high degree of influence, the quality of laboratory testing and reporting is of utmost importance. The IOM report [1] has far reaching implications for all disciplines including pathology activities and laboratory medicine. It is to the credit of the laboratory medicine specialty that the error rates in laboratory activities are far lower than that seen in overall clinical health care [6]. This quality, however,
Errors in emergency medicine
The chaos, the trauma, and the emergencies witnessed in the EDs are like no other in health care. This environment provides abundant opportunities for generating medical errors. The HMP Study II attributed nearly 3% of all adverse events as occurring in the EDs [4]. The IOM report suggested the highest prevalence of medical errors in EDs [1]. More importantly, it has been suggested that emergency medicine is a crucial area for preventable medical errors [33]. This assumes significance when one
Error in intensive care medicine
A majority of general hospitals have fully functioning intensive care units (ICUs). These units are managed by professionals from multiple disciplines and provide care for critically ill patients with life-threatening diseases or injuries. With such a clientele, provision of timely, high-quality care significantly enhances the chances of survival for these critically ill patients. Though ICUs may be further subdivided to cater to a specific subgroup of patients, like surgical ICUs (SICU),
Conclusion
The efforts to reduce medical errors and enhance patient safety can be directed toward many health care processes. Clinical diagnostic laboratories, EDs, and ICUs are recognized risk zones with high potential for error generation. It is prudent that maximum efforts are directed toward preventing errors in areas of high preventability. The human factors involved in generating errors in these specialties deserve priority, and appropriate technology may play a vital role in mitigating many of
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Drs. K.L. Massey, A. Mulla, and M. Qureshi for their discussion and suggestions in preparing the manuscript. I also thank Heather Neufeld, Ryan Sanders, Ajay Nayar, Todd Reichert, and Mitch Hesson for their useful contributions.
References (85)
- et al.
Normative and technical error in the emergency department
J. Emerg. Med.
(1983) - et al.
Malpractice claims against emergency physicians in Massachusetts: 1975–1993
Am. J. Emerg. Med.
(1996) - et al.
Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1993) - et al.
Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1991) - et al.
Misdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age
J. Emerg. Med.
(1995) - et al.
Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis: common features discovered in cases after litigation
Am. J. Emerg. Med.
(1994) - et al.
Clinically significant radiograph misinterpretations at an emergency medicine residency program
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1990) - et al.
Radiographic interpretation in the emergency department
Am. J. Emerg. Med.
(1996) - et al.
Assessment of thoracic X-ray readings by emergency room physicians at a university hospital [Article in Spanish]
Med. Clin. (Barc.)
(2001) - et al.
Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals
J. Crit. Care
(2003)
Critical incidents in the intensive therapy unit
Lancet
Hospital mortality in relation to staff workload: a 4-year study in an adult intensive-care unit
Lancet
The quality of intensive care nursing before, during, and after the introduction of nurses without ICU-training
Heart Lung
The effects of nursing staff inexperience (NSI) on the occurrence of adverse patient experiences in ICUs
Aust. Crit. Care
Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century
Medical errors: an introduction to concepts
Clin. Biochem.
The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study II
N. Engl. J. Med.
The quality in Australian health care study
Med. J. Aust.
Striving for perfection
Clin. Chem.
Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
Types of error within a clinical laboratory
J. Med. Lab. Technol.
The blunder-rate in a clinical biochemistry service
Ann. Clin. Biochem.
Comment on “Random errors in haematology tests”
Clin. Lab. Haematol.
Laboratory error undetectable by customary quality control/quality assurance monitors
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
Laboratory blunders revisited
Ann. Clin. Biochem.
Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care
JAMA
Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories
Med. J. Aust.
Assessment criteria and application guidelines
Risk management in pathology and laboratory medicine
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
Risk management at the front end of a clinical laboratory: a retrospective study [Abstract]
Clin. Biochem.
Frequency of problems during clinical molecular-genetic testing
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
Errors in laboratory medicine
Clin. Chem.
False-positive immunoassay results: a multicenter survey of erroneous immunoassay results from assays of 74 analytes in 10 donors from 66 laboratories in seven countries
Clin. Chem.
Wrong biochemistry results: two case reports and observational study in 5310 patients on potentially misleading thyroid-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin immunoassay results
Clin. Chem.
Gross errors and work flow analysis in the clinical laboratory
Klin. Biochem. Metab.
Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency
Clin. Chem.
Types and frequency of preanalytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory, a 6-month monitoring
BMC Clin. Pathol.
Using Q-Probes to improve the quality of laboratory medicine: a quality improvement program of the College of American Pathologists
Qual. Assur. Health Care
Continuous wristband monitoring over 2 years decreases identification errors: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
Cited by (128)
Missed critical value callbacks due to middleware flaw
2021, Clinical BiochemistryStandardization of sampling and sample preparation for analysis of human monocyte subsets in peripheral blood
2018, Journal of Immunological MethodsAdverse Effects in Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Hospitalized at the University Clinical Hospital
2022, Journal of Personalized Medicine