CommentaryChoose your tool wisely: U charts are more informative than run charts with or without tests of significance. A comment on Unbeck et al. (2014), Unbeck et al. (2013) and Kottner (2014)
References (31)
Content validity is naught
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2009)On measurements and their quality: Paper 1. Reliability – history, issues and procedures
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2013)- et al.
A multidimensional analysis of the epistemic origins of nursing theories, models, and frameworks
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2006) The value of Statistical Process Control in quality improvement contexts: a comment on Unbeck et al (2013)
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2014)- et al.
Design, application and impact of quality improvement ‘theme months’ in orthopaedic nursing: a mixed method case study on pressure ulcer prevention
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2013) - et al.
Authors’ response
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2014) - et al.
Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement
Qual. Saf. Health Care
(2003) - et al.
Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control
(2008) - et al.
Statistical process monitoring and feedback adjustment – a discussion
Technometrics
(1992) - et al.
Transforming care strategies and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes
J. Adv. Nurs.
(2010)
Out of the Crisis
(1986)
The quality of care. How can it be assessed?
JAMA
(1988)
Measurement for Better Governance – To Visualize and Manage Variation for Governance and Improvement of Public Services. [In Swedish: Mätningar för bättre styrning – att synliggöra och hantera variation för styrning och förbättring av offentlig verksamhet]
(2013)
Six Sigma Demystified
(2005)
Using statistical process control for monitoring the prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers
Ostomy Wound Manage.
(2010)
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.