Exploring knowledge exchange: A useful framework for practice and policy
Highlights
▸ Using empirical data gathered from UK healthcare teams we problematise linear approaches to knowledge translation. ▸ Our findings show that knowledge exchange is a dynamic and fluid process which incorporates knowledge from multiple sources. ▸ We contribute a clear description of the nature of knowledge exchange and a model which can help to reorient thinking. ▸ We propose that the model can act as a starting point for further exploration and evaluation.
Section snippets
Context
Finding ways of translating research-based knowledge into healthcare policy and practice has become one of the most pressing concerns over the last decade or more (Nutley, Walter, & Davies, 2007). This intense interest has been prompted by a range of well-rehearsed arguments about the social and economic damage caused by failures to put research evidence to good use (Berwick, 2003, Darzi, 2008, World Health Organization, 2004). In the wake of the current economic crisis arguments about wasted
Methods
Our research is an example of a small-N study which was designed to capture situational specificity within a framework of theoretical reasoning (Tsoukas, 2009). As such, it was informed by a realist approach because we were particularly interested in developing, refining and extending a theoretical understanding of knowledge exchange by investigating how the process unfolded in specific circumstances (Pawson and Sridharan, 2009, Pawson and Tilley, 1997). The research had three phases. First, we
Key components of knowledge exchange
Using an iterative process we defined the five components of our conceptual framework more tightly and applied these definitions to the data from each narrative. We found that all five components occurred on multiple occasions with each team and only identified 5 instances of data from the narratives which did not fit into one of the components. These came from the personal reflections of the knowledge broker herself and were found to particularly relate to the challenges associated with
Discussion
Having illuminated the nature of knowledge exchange across the three teams with whom we worked, we now return to the literature to consider the contribution of our findings and suggest how they can be used to reorient thinking about knowledge translation and exchange.
We found problem definition to be a crucial aspect of the knowledge exchange process but observed how this was open to continuous revision and evolution over time. This compares favourably with the concepts of knowledge exchange
Conclusion and implications
In this paper we have described how knowledge exchange occurred across three teams within a healthcare organisation and used this to develop a realistic and informative framework which illustrates the nature of knowledge exchange. Our assumption throughout has been that the gap between knowledge and action is a knowledge exchange problem and that understanding how this process is enacted in particular contexts can inform the development of more suitable approaches to knowledge translation. We
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Medical Research Council (grant no. G0601172). The authors would like to thank Dr Peter Trigwell and Professor Justin Keen who acted in an advisory capacity during the research. Final thanks go to all of our study participants and to the reviewers and colleagues who commented on this paper.
References (47)
- et al.
The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations
Social Science & Medicine
(2006) - et al.
Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
(2005) - et al.
Evidence based implementation of evidence based medicine
Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
(1999) - et al.
Making ‘what works’ work: the use of knowledge in UK health and social care decision-making
Policy and Society
(2010) - et al.
The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland (LNR): a programme protocol
Implementation Science
(2009) - et al.
The extent and organizational determinants of research utilization in Canadian health services organizations
Science Communication
(2007) Disseminating innovations in health care
Journal of the American Medical Association
(2003)- et al.
Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods
Evidence and Policy
(2010) Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development
(1998)The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in Canada’s health system
(2003)
Networks, innovation and public policy: Politicians, bureaucrats and the pathways to change inside government
A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks
High Quality Care for All: NHS next stage review final report
Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool
BMC Health Services Research
Organizational interventions
The nonspread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals
Academy of Management Journal
Case studies and theory development in the social sciences
What is this knowledge that we seek to “exchange”
The Milbank Quarterly
A comparative study of the literature on the dissemination and utilization of scientific knowledge
Innovation – the missing dimension
Usable knowledge: Social science and social problem-solving
A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?
Implementation Science
Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Cited by (168)
A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies
2024, Health Research Policy and Systems‘Insight unlocked’: Applying a collective intelligence approach to engage employers in informing local skills improvement planning
2024, Industry and Higher EducationInterviews with policymakers in Australian health policy: Understanding the process of policy development
2024, Journal of Public Health DentistryObstacles to co-producing evaluation knowledge: power, control and voluntary sector dynamics
2024, Evidence and Policy