Skip to main content
Log in

A System for Multiattribute Drug Product Comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a system for multiattribute drug product searching. We then demonstrate the system's performance on sample queries, and evaluate the name-based similarity searching component. Ten drug names were used to query a database of existing drug names using five different retrieval methods. Retrieved names were merged into master lists and presented to 15 pharmacists. Pharmacists rated the similarity between the query name and each retrieved names on a scale of 1–5. We report the precision of our five different retrieval methods at 11 levels of recall. The best single measure was editex, with a precision of 17.4% averaged across 11 levels of recall. A regression model using four objective measures of similarity as predictors accounted for 40.6% of the variance in observed mean similarity ratings. Automated, multiattribute drug product searching may improve the effectiveness and efficiency of preapproval screening processes and thereby prevent medication errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Pharmacopeia. USP Quality Review. U. S. Pharmacopeia, March. Available at http://www.usp.org/reporting/review/qr76.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2001.

  2. Avantiq. Avantiq Home Page. Available at http://www.avantiq.com/visitors/main.htm. Accessed March 3, 2003.

  3. Kim, H.-J., and Phillips, J., Medication errors associated with Serzone and Seroquel. Drug Topics 7:38–40, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, M. R., Drug product characteristics that foster drug-use-system errors. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 52:395–399, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert, B. L., (inventor), Apparatus, method, and product for multiattribute drug comparison. US patent 6, 529, 892, March 4, 2003.

  6. Lambert, B. L., Chang, K. Y., and Lin, S. J., Descriptive analysis of the drug name lexicon. Drug Inf. J. 35:163–172, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Multum Information Services, Inc. The Multum Lexicon. Multum Information Services Inc. Available at http://www.multum.com/Lexicon.htm. Accessed January 28, 2003.

  8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book data files. U. S. Food and Drug Administration [Web page], January 29, 2003. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/orange/obreadme.htm. Accessed February 28, 2003.

  9. Lambert, B. L., Predicting look-and sound-alike medication errors. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 54:1161–1171, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lambert, B. L., Lin, S.-J., Gandhi, S. K., and Chang, K.-Y., Similarity as a risk factor in drug name confusion errors: The look-alike (orthographic) and sound-alike (phonological) model. Med. Care. 37(12):1214–1225, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert, B. L., Chang, K. Y., and Lin, S. J., Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. Soc. Sci. Med. 52:1843–1857, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lambert, B. L., Donderi, D., and Senders, J., Similarity of drug names: Objective and subjective measures. Psychol. Marketing 19(7–8):641–661, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lambert, B. L., Chang, K.-Y., and Lin, S.-J., Immediate free recall of drug names: Effects of similarity and availability. Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 60:156–168, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen, G. A., String Searching Algorithms, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ukkonen, E., Approximate string-matching with q-grams and maximal matches. Theor. Comp. Sci. 92:191–211, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zobel, J., and Dart, P. Phonetic string matching: Lessons from information retrieval. Paper presented at 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 18–22, 1996, Zurich, Switzerland.

  17. Zobel, J., and Dart, P., Finding approximate matches in large lexicons. Software-Pract. Experience 25(3):331–345, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeifer, U., Poersch, T., and Fuhr, N., Searching for proper names in databases. Paper presented at Hypertext-Information Retrieval-Multimedia: Synergistic Effects of Electronic Information Systems, 5–7 April 1995, Konstanz, Germany.

  19. Gernsbacher, M. A., ed. Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fisher, W. M., A statistical text-to-phone function using ngrams and rules. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, March 15–19, 1999, Phoenix, AZ.

  21. Fisher, W. M., Fiscus, J. G., Martin, A., Pallett, D. S., and Pryzbocki, M. A., Further studies in phonological scoring. Proc. Spoken Language Syst. Technol. Workshop 1995:181–186.

  22. Jurafsky, D., and Martin, J. H., Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Electronic Orange Book data files. U. S. Food and Drug Administration [Web page]. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/orange/obreadme.htm. Accessed January 28, 2003.

  24. Lambert, B. L., Chang, K.-Y., and Gupta, P., Effects of frequency and similarity neighborhoods on pharmacists' visual perception of drug names. Soc. Sci. Med. in press.

  25. Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B., Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear Hearing 19(1):1–36, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., and Goldinger, S. D., Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In Altmann, G. T. M. (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990, pp. 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M., Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychol. Rev. 103(3):518–565, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salton, G., and McGill, M., Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Pharmacopeia. USP DI. Vol. I: Drug Information for the Health Care Professional. U.S. Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Pharmacopeia. USP Dictionary of USAN and International Drug Names, U.S. Pharmacopeia, Rockville, MD, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Trademarks Registered. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—Office of Electronic Information Products [CD-ROM], February 1999. Available at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/catalog/tmcassis.htm#TMregistered. Accessed June 15, 1999.

  32. Voorhees, E. M., and Harman, D., Overview of the sixth text retrieval conference (TREC-6). Paper presented at The sixth text retrieval conference (TREC-6), November 19–21, 1997, 1998, Gaithersburg, MD.

  33. Yu, C., and Meng, W., Principles of Query Processing for Advanced Database Applications, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Phillips, J., The name game: New realities at FDA. Pharm. Exec. July; 2000:66–69.

  36. Boring, D., The development and adoption of nonproprietary, established, and proprietary names for pharmaceuticals. Drug Inf. J. 31:621–634, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boring, D. L., The CDER labeling and nomenclature committee: Structure, function, and process. Drug Inf. J. 31:7–11, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Boring, D. L., Stein, I. A., Di Domizio, G., United States: Trademark trainwrecks at FDA. Trademark World 1998:29–33.

  39. Cohen, M. (ed.), Medication Errors, American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington, DC, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., Donaldson, M. S. (eds.), To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Vol. 7(7), Institute for Safe Medication Practices, Huntingdon Valley, PA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  42. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Automated method of minimizing medication errors due to similar proprietary and established names (RFQ #223-02-5618), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, 2002.

  43. Pedhazur, E. J., Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, Harcourt Brace, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, B.L., Yu, C. & Thirumalai, M. A System for Multiattribute Drug Product Comparison. Journal of Medical Systems 28, 31–56 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOMS.0000021519.75230.e5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOMS.0000021519.75230.e5

Navigation