Skip to main content
Log in

Quality improvement for depression enhances long-term treatment knowledge for primary care clinicians

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of implementing quality improvement (QI) programs for depression, relative to usual care, on primary care clinicians’ knowledge about treatment.

DESIGN AND METHODS: Matched primary care clinics (46) from seven managed care organizations were randomized to usual care (mailed written guidelines only) versus one of two QI interventions. Self-report surveys assessed clinicians’ knowledge of depression treatments prior to full implementation (June 1996 to March 1997) and 18 months later. We used an intent-to-treat analysis to examine intervention effects on change in knowledge, controlling for clinician and practice characteristics, and the nested design.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-one primary care clinicians.

INTERVENTIONS: The interventions included institutional commitment to QI, training local experts, clinician education, and training nurses for patient assessment and education. One intervention had resources for nurse follow-up on medication use (QI-meds) and the other had reduced copayment for therapy from trained, local therapists (QI-therapy).

RESULTS: Clinicians in the intervention group had greater increases compared with clinicians in the usual care group over 18 months in knowledge of psychotherapy (by 20% for QI-meds, P=.04 and by 33% for QI-therapy, P=.004), but there were no significant increases in medication knowledge. Significant increases in knowledge scores (P=.01) were demonstrated by QI-therapy clinicians but not clinicians in the QI-meds group. Clinicians were exposed to multiple intervention components.

CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of QI programs for depression in managed, primary care practices improved clinicians’ treatment knowledge over 18 months, but breadth of learning was somewhat greater for a program that also included active collaboration with local therapists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de facto U.S. mental and addictive disorder service system: Epidemiologic Catchment Area prospective one-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler RC, McGonagel KA, Shanzang Z, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER. The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54:405–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wells KB, Sturm R, Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS. Caring for Depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sturm R, Wells KB. How can care for depression become more cost-effective? JAMA. 1995;273:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson SM, Harthorn BH. Changing the psychiatric knowledge of primary care physicians. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1990;12:177–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:924–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin E, Katon W, Simon G, et al. Achieving guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary care; Is physician education enough? Med Care. 1998;35:831–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians’ behavior. New Eng J Med. 1993;329:1271–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullet: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995;153:1423–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279:358–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Soumerai SB, Avorn JA. Principles of education outreach (“academic detailing”) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263:549–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Med Care. 1986;24:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1339–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubenstein LV, Jackson-Triche M, Unützer J, et al. Evidence-based interventions for depression in managed primary care practices. Health Aff. 1999;18:89–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells KB. The design of Partners in Care: evaluating the cost-effectiveness of improving care for depression in primary care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34:20–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Partners in Care. Improving Quality of Care for Depression in Primary Care. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND, MR-1198-AHRQ; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clinician Guide to Depression Assessment and Management in Primary Care Settings. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND, MR-1198/1-AHRQ; 2000.

  23. Munoz RF, Miranda J. Group Therapy Manual for Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Depression. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND, MR-1198/4-AHRQ; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Munoz RF, Miranda J. Individual Therapy Manual for Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Depression. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND, MR-1198/6-AHRQ; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubenstein LV, Jackson-Triche M, Unützer J, et al. Evidence-based interventions for depression in managed primary care practices. Health Affairs. 1999;18:89–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Meredith LS, Rubenstein LV, Rost KM, et al. Treating depression in staff model vs network model managed care organizations. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:39–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kreft GG, De Leeuw J. Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Models, 2nd ed. New York: Halstead Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singer JD. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J Educ Behavioral Statistics. 1998;24:323–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consulting Clin Psychology. 1983;51:390–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wells KB, Sherbourne CD, Schoenbaum M, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care. JAMA. 2000;283:212–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa S. Meredith PhD.

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (R01-HS08349) and the National Institute of Mental Health (R29-MH55223-01).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meredith, L.S., Jackson-Triche, M., Duan, N. et al. Quality improvement for depression enhances long-term treatment knowledge for primary care clinicians. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 868–877 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91149.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91149.x

Key words

Navigation