Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What factors influence physicians’ decisions to switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: One of the major factors influencing length of stay for patients with community-acquired pneumonia is the timing of conversion from intravenous to oral antibiotics. We measured physician attitudes and beliefs about the antibiotic switch decision and assessed physician characteristics associated with practice beliefs.

DESIGN: Written survey assessing attitudes about the antibiotic conversion decision.

SETTING: Seven teaching and non-teaching hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pa.

PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred forty-five generalist and specialist attending physicians who manage pneumonia in 7 hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Factors rated as “very important” to the antibiotic conversion decision were: absence of suppurative infection (93%), ability to maintain oral intake (79%), respiratory rate at baseline (64%), no positive blood cultures (63%), normal temperature (62%), oxygenation at baseline (55%), and mental status at baseline (50%). The median thresholds at which physicians believed a typical patient could be converted to oral therapy were: temperature ≤100°F (37.8°C), respiratory rate ≤20 breaths/minute, heart rate ≤100 beats/minute, systolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg, and room air oxygen saturation ≥90%. Fiftyeight percent of physicians felt that “patients should be afebrile for 24 hours before conversion to oral antibiotics,” and 19% said, “patients should receive a standard duration of intravenous antibiotics.” In univariate analyses, pulmonary and infectious diseases physicians were the most predisposed towards early conversion to oral antibiotics, and other medical specialists were the least predisposed, with generalists being intermediate (P<.019). In multivariate analyses, practice beliefs were associated with age, inpatient care activities, attitudes about guidelines, and agreeableness on a personality inventory scale.

CONCLUSIONS: Physicians believed that patients could be switched to oral antibiotics once vital signs and mental status had stabilized and oral intake was possible. However, there was considerable variation in several antibiotic practice beliefs. Guidelines and pathways to streamline antibiotic therapy should include educational strategies to address some of these differences in attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. National Inpatient Statistics, 1996. Vol. 99-0034;1999.

  2. Lave JR, Lin CC, Fine MJ, et al. The cost of treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;20:189–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns LR, Wholey DR. The effects of patient, hospital, and physician characteristics on length of stay and mortality. Med Care. 1991;29:251–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cleary PD, Geenfield S, Mulley AG, et al. Variations in length of stay and outcomes for six medical and surgical conditions in Massachusetts and California. JAMA. 1991;266:73–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormick D, Fine MJ, Coley CM, et al. Variation in length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: are shorter stays associated with worse medical outcomes? Am J Med. 1999;107:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fine MJ, Singer DE, Phelps AL, et al. Differences in length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective four-hospital study. Med Care. 1993;31:371–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halm EA, Fine MJ, Marrie TJ, et al. Time to clinical stability in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: implications for practice guidelines. JAMA. 1998;279:1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fine MJ, Medsger AR, Stone RA, et al. The hospital discharge decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:47–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, File TM Jr. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:811–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Niederman MS, Bass JB Jr, Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148:1418–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marrie TJ. Community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:501–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson DN. Jackson Personality Inventory Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the big five factor structure. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:956–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeger SL, Lian KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42:121–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, et al. Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1996;275:134–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jay SJ, Johnson WGJ, Pierce AK. The radiographic resolution of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:798–801.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacFarlane JT, Miller AC, Smith WH, et al. Comparative radiographic features of community-acquired Legionnaires’ disease, pneumococcal pneumonia, Mycoplasma pneuemoniae and psittacosis. Thorax. 1984;36:369–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weingarten SR, Riedinger MS, Hobson P, et al. Evaluation of a pneumonia practice guideline in an interventional trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:1110–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rhew DC, Hackner D, Henderson L, et al. The clinical benefit of inhospital observation in ‘low-risk’ pneumonia patients after conversion from parenteral to oral antimicrobial therapy. Chest. 1998;113:142–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunn AS, Peterson KL, Schechter CB, et al. The utility of an inhospital observation period after discontinuing intravenous antibiotics. Am J Med. 1999;106:6–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramirez JA, Srinath L, Ahkee S, et al. Early switch from intravenous to oral cephalosporins in the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1273–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel RE, Halpern NA, Almenoff PL, et al. A prospective randomized study of inpatient IV antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. The optimal duration of therapy. Chest. 1996;110:965–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez JA, Vargas S, Ritter GW, et al. Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics and early hospital discharge. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2449–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Switzer GE, Halm EA, Goldman J, et al. Physician familiarity with and use of national and local pneumonia practice guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(suppl):124.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Halm EA, Causino N, Blumenthal D. Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians’ attitudes. JAMA. 1997;278:1677–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ethan A. Halm MD, MPH.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and by National Institute of Allergy and Immunology grant #R01 HS08282-02. Drs. Fine and Halm were supported in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Physician Faculty Scholars Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halm, E.A., Switzer, G.E., Mittman, B.S. et al. What factors influence physicians’ decisions to switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia?. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 599–605 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009599.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009599.x

Key words

Navigation