Skip to main content
Log in

Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice

A randomized trial of the quest intervention

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether redefining primary care team roles would improve outcomes for patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression.

DESIGN: Following stratification, 6 of 12 practices were randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated by patient reports of 6-month change in 100-point depression symptom and functional status scales.

SETTING: Twelve community primary care practices across the country employing no onsite mental health professional.

PATIENTS: Using two-stage screening, practices enrolled 479 depressed adult patients (73.4% of those eligible); 90.2% completed six-month follow-up.

INTERVENTION: Two primary care physicians, one nurse, and one administrative staff member in each intervention practice received brief training to improve the detection and management of major depression.

MAIN RESULTS: In patients beginning a new treatment episode, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 8.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 16.1; P=.04). Within this group, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 16.2 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 27.9; P=.007), physical role functioning by 14.1 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 29.2; P=.07), and satisfaction with care (P=.02) for patients who reported antidepressant medication was an acceptable treatment at baseline. Patients already in treatment at enrollment did not benefit from the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS: In practices without onsite mental health professionals, brief interventions training primary care teams to assume redefined roles can significantly improve depression outcomes in patients beginning a new treatment episode. Such interventions should target patients who report that antidepressant medication is an acceptable treatment for their condition. More research is needed to determine how primary care teams can best sustain these redefined roles over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rost KM, Zhang M, Fortney J, Smith J, Coyne J, Smith GR Jr. Persistently poor outcomes of undetected major depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1998;20:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulberg HC, McClelland M, Gooding W. Six-month outcomes for medical patients with major depressive disorders. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:312–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, et al. The ‘usual care’ of major depression in primary care practice. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:334–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon GE, VonKorff M. Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4: 99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin EHB, Katon WJ, Von Korff M, et al. Relapse of depression in primary care: rate and clinical predictors. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:443–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wells KB, Burnam A, Rogers W, Hays R, Camp P. The course of depression in adult outpatients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:788–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines: impact on depression in primary care. JAMA. 1995;273:1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katzelnick DJ, Simon GE, Pearson SD, et al. Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:345–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells KB, Sherbourne CD, Schoenbaum M, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;283:212–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, et al. Treating major depression in primary care practice: eight-month clinical outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:913–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miranda J, Munoz R. Intervention for minor depression in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 1994;56:136–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams JW Jr, Rost K, Dietrich AJ, Ciotti MC, Zyzanski SJ, Cornell J. Primary care physicians’ approach to depressive disorders: Effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunkeler EM, Meresman J, Hargreaves WA, et al. Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:700–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simon GE, Von Korff M, Rutter C, Wagner E. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve depression treatment in primary care. Br Med J. 2000;320:550–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mynors-Wallis L, Davies I, Gray A, Barbour F, Gath D. A randomised controlled trial and cost analysis of problem-solving treatment for emotional disorders given by community nurses in primary care. Br J Psychiatry. 1997;170:113–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klerman GL, Budman S, Berwick D, et al. Efficacy of a brief psychosocial intervention for symptoms of stress and distress among patients in primary care. Med Care. 1987;25:1078–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Volume 1. Detection and Diagnosis. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 5. (AHCPR Publication No. 93-0550). Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Volume 2. Treatment of Major Depression. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 5. (AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551). Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Coyne J, Cooper-Patrick L, Rubenstein L. The role of competing demands in the treatment provided primary care patients with major depression. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:150–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rost K, Nutting PA, Smith J, Werner JJ. Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000;22:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interview for Primary Care, Version 2.0. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmerman M, Coryell W, Wilson S, Corenthal C. Evaluation of symptoms of major depressive disorder: Self-report vs. clinician ratings. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986;174:150–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Horwitz SM, Hoagwood K, Stiffman AR, et al. Measuring youth’s use of mental health services: Reliability of the SACA-Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents. Psychiatr Serv. In press.

  25. Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE. The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 1986;41:159–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Covi L, Primakoff L. Cognitive group therapy. In: Frances AJ, Hales RE, eds. American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 7. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1988: 608–21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Myers JK, Weissman MM. Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137:1081–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:924–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldberg D. A classification of psychological distress for use in primary care settings. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:189–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:1109–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dowrick C, Buchan I. Twelve month outcome of depression in general practice: does detection or disclosure make a difference? Br Med J. 1995;311:1274–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Linn LS, Yager J. The effect of screening, sensitization, and feedback on notation of depression. J Med Educ. 1980;55:942–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang M, Rost KM, Fortney JC. Earnings changes for depressed individuals treated by mental health specialists. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:108–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Rost PhD.

Additional information

This research was supported by NIMH grants R01 MH54444 and P50 MH48197 and by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rost, K., Nutting, P., Smith, J. et al. Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 143–149 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00537.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00537.x

Key words

Navigation