Skip to main content
Log in

The disavowed curriculum

Understanding students’ reasoning in professionally challenging situations

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CONTEXT: Understanding students’ perceptions of and responses to lapses in professionalism is important to shaping students’ professional development.

OBJECTIVE: Utilize realistic, standardized professional dilemmas to obtain insight into students’ reasoning and motivations in “real time.”

DESIGN: Qualitative study using 5 videotaped scenarios (each depicting a student placed in a situation which requires action in response to a professional dilemma) and individual interviews, in which students were questioned about what they would do next and why.

SETTING: University of Toronto.

PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen fourth-year medical students; participation voluntary and anonymous.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A model to explain students’ reasoning in the face of professional dilemmas.

RESULTS: Grounded theory analysis of interview transcripts revealed that students were motivated to consider specific actions by referencing a Principle (an abstract or idealized concept), an Affect (a feeling or emotion), or an Implication (a potential consequence of suggested actions). Principles were classified as “avowed” as ideals of four profession (e.g., honesty or disclosure), or “unavowed” (unacknowledged or undeclared, e.g., obedience or allegiance). Implications could also be avowed (e.g., concerning patients) or unavowed (e.g., concerning others); but students were predominantly motivated by considering “disavowed” implications: those pertaining to themselves (e.g., concern for grades, evaluations, or reputation), which are actively denied by the profession and discouraged as being inconsistent with altruism.

CONCLUSIONS: This “disavowed curriculum” has implications for education, feedback, and evaluation. Instead of denying their existence, we should teach students how to negotiate and balance these unavowed and disavowed implications and principles, in order to help them develop their own professional stance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med. 2002;77:502–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsburg SR, Regehr GR, Hatala R, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S6–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Christakis DA, Feudtner C. Ethics in a short white coat: the ethical dilemmas that medical students confront. Acad Med. 1993;68:249–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldwin DC, Daugherty SR, Rowley BD. Unethical and unprofessional conduct observed by residents during their first year of training. Acad Med. 1998;73:1195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Satterwhite RC, Satterwhite WM III, Enarson C. An ethical paradox: the effect of unethical conduct on medical students’ values. J Med Ethics. 2000;26:462–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hicks L, Lin Y, Robertson DW, Robinson DL, Woodward SI. Understanding the clinical dilemmas that shape medical students’ ethical development: a questionnaire survey and focus group study. BMJ. 2001;322:709–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsburg SR, Regehr G, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students’ perceptions. Acad Med. 2002;77:516–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lingard L, Garwood K, Szauter K, Stern DT. The rhetoric of rationalization: how students grapple with professional dilemmas. Acad Med. 2001;76(10 suppl):S45–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginsburg SR, Regehr G, Lingard L. To be and not to be: the paradox of the emerging professional stance. Med Educ. 2003;37:350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. 1st edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser BG, Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelle U. Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Project Professionalism. American Board of Internal Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69:861–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stern DT. Practicing what we preach? An analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med. 1998;104:569–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiphra Ginsburg MD, MEd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginsburg, S., Regehr, G. & Lingard, L. The disavowed curriculum. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 1015–1022 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.21247.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.21247.x

Key words

Navigation