Abstract
Background
Factors that affect the quality of clinical decisions of multidisciplinary cancer teams (MDTs) are not well understood. We reviewed and synthesised the evidence on clinical, social and technological factors that affect the quality of MDT clinical decision-making.
Methods
Electronic databases were searched in May 2009. Eligible studies reported original data, quantitative or qualitative. Data were extracted and tabulated by two blinded reviewers, and study quality formally evaluated.
Results
Thirty-seven studies were included. Study quality was low to medium. Studies assessed quality of care decisions via the effect of MDTs on care management. MDTs changed cancer management by individual physicians in 2–52% of cases. Failure to reach a decision at MDT discussion was found in 27–52% of cases. Decisions could not be implemented in 1–16% of cases. Team decisions are made by physicians, using clinical information. Nursing personnel do not have an active role, and patient preferences are not discussed. Time pressure, excessive caseload, low attendance, poor teamworking and lack of leadership lead to lack of information and deterioration of decision-making. Telemedicine is increasingly used in developed countries, with no detriment to quality of MDT decisions.
Conclusions
Team/social factors affect management decisions by cancer MDTs. Inclusion of time to prepare for MDTs into team-members’ job plans, making team and leadership skills training available to team-members, and systematic input from nursing personnel would address some of the current shortcomings. These improvements ought to be considered at national policy level, with the ultimate aim of improving cancer care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Katz MH, Wang H, Fleming JB, et al. Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(4):836–47.
Dozois EJ, Wall JC, Spinner RJ, et al. Neurogenic tumors of the pelvis: clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes using a multidisciplinary team. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(4):1010–6.
Manganoni AM, Farisoglio C, Ferrari V, et al. Multidisciplinary team-working indicators of good practice in the clinical management of EGFR-inhibitor dermatologic toxicities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(1):224–5.
Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D, Davis D, McLeod RS, Gagliardi AR. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2731–7.
Manual for Cancer Services 2004. London: Department of Health; 2004.
Fleissig AJ, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11).
Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis RE, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Sevdalis N. Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):749–64.
Davies AR, Deans DA, Penman I, et al. The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(6):496–503.
Penel N, Grosjean J, Pichon-Watelle F, et al. Factors favouring palliative treatment multidisciplinary decisions for newly diagnosed visceral and soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Oncol. 2008;20:523–7.
Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A. Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1937–44.
Ganesan P, Kumar L, Hariprasad R, Gupta A, Dawar R, Vijayaraghavan M. Improving care in ovarian cancer: The role of a clinico-pathological meeting. Natl Med J India. 2008;21(5): 225–7.
Junnola T, Eriksson E, Salantera S, Lauri S. Nurses’ decision-making in collecting information for the assessment of patients’ nursing problems. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11(2):186–96.
Kunkler IH, Prescott RJ, Lee RJ, et al. TELEMAM: A cluster randomised trial to assess the use of telemedicine in multi-disciplinary breast cancer decision making. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(17):2506–14.
Kee F, Owen T, Leathem R. Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: When is a team of experts an expert team? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):308–13.
Gatcliffe TA, Coleman RL. Tumor board: more than treatment planning—a 1-year prospective survey. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(4):235–7.
Acher PL, Young AJ, Etherington-Foy R, McCahy PJ, Deane AM. Improving outcomes in urological cancers: The impact of “multidisciplinary team meetings”. Int J Surg. 2005;3(2):121–3.
Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ, Rosato EF, Lawton T, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2001;91(7):1231–7.
Kidger J, Murdoch J, Donovan JL, Blazeby JM. Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2009;116(4):511–7.
Amir Z, Scully J, Borrill C. The professional role of breast cancer nurses in multi-disciplinary breast cancer care teams. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004;8(4):306–14.
Lanceley A, Savage J, Menon U, Jacobs I. Influences on multidisciplinary team decision-making. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(2):215–22.
Random.org- True random number generator. http://www.random.org/. Accessed June 30, 2009.
Brown KF, Long SL, Athanasiou T, Vincent CA, Kroll JS, Sevdalis N. Reviewing methodologically disparate data: a practical guide to the patient safety research field. J Eval Clin Pract.
Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone RL. The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery. 2010;147:318–30.
Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer Ke. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees. JAMA. 2009;302:1316–26.
Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians. JAMA. 2007;298:1023–37.
Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan JL. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(3):457–60.
Clarke MG, Wilson JR, Kennedy KP, MacDonagh RP. Clinical judgment analysis of the parameters used by consultant urologists in the management of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2007;178(1):98–102.
Davison AG, Eraut CD, Haque AS, Doffman S, Tanqueray A, Trask CW, Lamont A, et al. Telemedicine for multidisciplinary lung cancer meetings. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(3):140–3.
Fielding RG, Macnab M, Swann S, Kunkler IH, Brebner J, Prescott RJ, et al. Attitudes of breast cancer professionals to conventional and telemedicine-delivered multidisciplinary breast meetings. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(Suppl 2):S29–34.
Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Dunlop DJ. An evaluation of the impact of a multidisciplinary team, in a single centre, on treatment and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(9):977–8.
Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, Dawson J, Scully J, West M, et al. Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(1):15–22.
Kee F, Owen T, Leathem R. Decision making in a multidisciplinary cancer team: Does team discussion result in better quality decisions? Med Decis Making. 2004;24:602–13.
Kelly MJ, Lloyd TD, Marshall D, Garcea G, Sutton CD, Beach M. A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(6):577–81.
Kunkler I, Fielding G, Macnab M, Swann S, Brebner J, Prescott R, et al. Group dynamics in telemedicine-delivered and standard multidisciplinary team meetings: Results from the TELEMAM randomised trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(Suppl 3):55–8.
Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM, Dixon JM. Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(7):905–8.
Soukop M, Robinson A, Soukop D, Ingham-Clark CL, Kelly MJ. Results of a survey of the role of multidisciplinary team coordinators for colorectal cancer in England and Wales. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(2):146–50.
Wilson J, Kennedy K, Ewings P, Macdonagh R. Analysis of consultant decision-making in the management of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(3):288–93.
Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A, Sylvester P, Durdey P, Thomas MG, Blazeby JM. An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(8):769–72.
Leo F, Venissac N, Poudenx M, Otto J, Mouroux J; Groupe d’Oncologie. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer: how to test its efficacy? J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(1):69–72.
Penel N, Valentin F, Giscard S, Vanseymortier L, Beuscart R. General practitioners assessment of a structured report on medical decision making by a regional multidisciplinary cancer committee. Bull Cancer. 2007;94(10):E23–6.
Seroussi B, Bouaud J, Gligorov J, Uzan S. Supporting multidisciplinary staff meetings for guideline-based breast cancer management: a study with OncoDoc2. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:656–60.
Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, Roubidoux MA, Chang AE, Kleer CG, Diehl KM, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer. 2006;107(10):2346–51.
Delaney G, Jacob S, Iedema R, Winters M, Barton M. Comparison of face-to-face and videoconferenced multidisciplinary clinical meetings. Australas Radiol. 2004;48(4):487–92.
Sidhom M, Poulsen M. Group decisions in oncology: Doctors’ perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetings. J Med Imag Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(3):287–92.
Bumm R, Feith M, Lordick F, Herschbach P, and Siewert JR. Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer. Eur Surg Acta Chirurg Austriaca. 2007;39(3):136–40.
Lutterbach J, Pagenstecher A, Spreer J, Hetzel A, Velthoven V, Nikkhah G, Frommhold H, et al. The brain tumor board: lessons to be learned from an interdisciplinary conference. Onkologie. 2005;28(1):22–6.
Epstein RL, Leung TW, Mak J, Cheung PS. Utility of a web-based breast cancer predictive algorithm for adjuvant chemotherapeutic decision making in a multidisciplinary oncology center. Cancer Invest. 2006;24(4):367–73.
Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Ruers TJ. Computer-based decision making in medicine: A model for surgery of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(suppl. 2):S111–7.
Stalfors J, Lundberg C, Westin T. Quality assessment of a multidisciplinary tumour meeting for patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2007;127(1):82–7.
Kim MM, Barnato AE, Angus DC, Fleisher LA, Kahn JM. The effect of multidisciplinary care teams on intensive care unit mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(4):369–76.
Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1553–81.
Mitchell GK, Brown RM, Erikssen L, Tieman JJ. Multidisciplinary care planning in the primary care management of completed stroke: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:44.
McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, McMurray JJ. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(4):810–9.
Merién AE, van de Ven J, Mol BW, Houterman S, Oei SG. Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):1021–31.
Kunzle B, Kolbe M, Grote G. Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behaviour: a literature review. Safety Sci. 2010;48:1–17.
Multidisciplinary Team Members Views About MDT Working. Results from a survey commissioned by the National Cancer Action Team. London: NHS National Cancer Action Team; 2009.
Lamb BW, Payne H, Vincent C, et al. The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership? J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Jul 27. [Epub ahead of print].
Lamb B, Sevdalis N. How do nurses make decisions? Int J Nurs Stud. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.003 .
Educational Initiatives to Improve the Effectiveness of Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams. London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges; 2009.
Lamb BW, Green JSA, Vincent C, et al. Decision-making in surgical oncology. Surg Oncol. (2010). doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2010.07.007.
Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF. Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(2):125–34. Review.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research through the Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality and Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust R&D Department. The funding source played no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamb, B.W., Brown, K.F., Nagpal, K. et al. Quality of Care Management Decisions by Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 2116–2125 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6