Skip to main content
Log in

A Feasibility Study for Recording of Dispensing Errors and ‘Near Misses’ in Four UK Primary Care Pharmacies

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medication errors can occur at the prescribing, transcription, dispensing and administration stage of drug therapy. However, publication of the Organisation with a Memory (OWAM) by the Department of Health in the UK has raised awareness of the need for pharmacies to collect information about dispensing errors and near misses, which occur within an organisation. Such information provides valuable insights into the vulnerabilities of dispensing procedures and identifies areas for improvement in dispensing systems

The main aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a self-reporting system for dispensing errors and near misses in primary care (community) pharmacies. It was also to identify the types of errors or near misses commonly encountered in community pharmacies.

A data collection form was designed and modified for use after a pilot study. Four community pharmacies volunteered to participate in this feasibility study. The data collection was conducted in two phases each of 4 weeks’ duration. Any dispensing errors and near misses that occurred during the study periods were recorded by the pharmacy staff in a standard data collection form. A focus group discussion was held with the dispensing staff of participating pharmacies to identify and evaluate the feasibility of the reporting system.

Out of a total of 51 357 items dispensed during the two phases of the study, 39 dispensing errors (0.08%) and 247 near misses (0.48%) were detected. The results show that near misses occurred six times more often than dispensing errors, indicating the importance of final checking in pharmacies. The most common types of dispensing errors or near misses appeared to be incorrect strength of medication, followed by incorrect drug, incorrect quantity, incorrect dosage form and incorrect label. Feedback during the focus group discussion indicated that the outcome of the self-reporting scheme was more important than the incidence of errors or near misses. Participating pharmacies also agreed that the self-reporting scheme used was feasible and they would continue using the scheme although some incentives would be helpful.

The quantitative results of this study and the qualitative feedback from the participating pharmacies indicate that the self-reporting scheme used is practical and feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Bates DW. Medication errors: how common are they and what can be done to prevent them? Drug Saf 1996; 15(5): 303–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavell GF, Oborne A. Anonymously reported medication errors: the tip of the iceberg [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9Suppl.: R52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross Z. Benefits of recording interventions. Pharm J 2001; 267: 188

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cerulli J. The role of the community pharmacist in identifying, preventing, and resolving drug-related problems [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/421293 [Accessed 2003 Jun 10]

  5. Rupp MT, DeYoung M, Schondelmeyer SW. Prescribing problems and pharmacist interventions in community practice. Med Care 1992; 30: 926–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah SNH, Aslam M, Avery AJ. A survey of prescription errors in general practice. Pharm J 2001; 267: 860–2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferner RE. Medication errors that have led to manslaughter charges. BMJ 2000 Nov 11; 321: 1212–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Claesson CB, Burman K, Nilsson JLG, et al. Prescription errors detected by Swedish pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract 1995; 3: 151–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allan EL, Barker KN. Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990; 47: 555–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dean B, Barber N. Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 54–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pharmacists can help prevent and minimize medication errors. Pharm J 2001; 267: 363

  12. Landis NT. Federal actions for error reduction outlined. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2000; 57(7): 626, 631-2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stump LS. Re-engineering the medication error-reporting process: removing the blame and improving the system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000; 57Suppl. 4: S10–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edgar AD, Lee DS, Cousins DD. Experience with a national medication error reporting program. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994; 51: 1335–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross LM, Wallace J, Paton JY. Medication errors in a paediatric teaching hospital in the UK: five years operational experience. Arch Dis Child 2000; 83: 492–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hartwig SC, Denger SD, Schneider PJ. Severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991 Dec; 48: 2611–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clinical Pharmacy. Scheme of anonymous reporting for medication errors. Pharm J 1993; 251: 796

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boots tackles causes of dispensing errors. Pharm J 2001; 267: 451

  19. Department of Health. An organization with a memory. HMSO, London: The Stationery Office; 2000 Jun

  20. Oborne CA, Burgess B, Cavell GF, et al. Anonymous reporting of drug-related errors: application of a modified secondary care model in a community pharmacy setting. Pharm J 2002; 268: 101–3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cavell GF, Burgess V, Oborne CA, et al. Attitude of community pharmacists towards medication error reporting [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9Suppl.: R64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pruce D. Ready-to-go series. Dispensing errors: dispensing process topic audit risk management. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buchanan TL, Barker KN, Gibson JT, et al. Illumination and errors in dispensing. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991; 48: 2137–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn EA, Barker KN, Gibson JT, et al. Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1999; 56(13): 1319–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kistner UA, Keith MR, Sergeant KA, et al. Accuracy of dispensing in a high-volume, hospital-based outpatient pharmacy. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994 Nov 15; 51: 2793–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Guernsey BG, Ingrim NB, Hokanson JA, et al. Pharmacists’ dispensing accuracy in a high-volume outpatient pharmacy service: focus on risk management. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1983 Oct; 17(10): 742–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Allan EL, Barker KN, Malloy MJ, et al. Dispensing errors and counseling in community practice. Am Pharm 1995; NS35(12): 25–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Quinlan P, Ashcroft DM, Blenkinsopp A. Medication errors: a baseline survey of dispensing errors reported in community pharmacies [abstract]. Int J Pharm Pract 2002; 10Suppl.: R68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ringold DJ, Santell JP, Schneider PJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in acute care settings: dispensing and administration: 1999. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000 Oct; 57(1): 1759–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. ASHP Report. ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors in hospitals. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993 Feb; 50 (2): 305–14

  31. Davis NM. Detection and prevention of ambulatory care pharmacy dispensing errors. Hosp Pharm 1990; 25: 18–22, 25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dooley MJ, Streater J, Wilks JJ. Strategy for identification of ‘near miss’ events and improving dispensing accuracy. Aust J Hosp Pharm 2001; 31(2): 125–8

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marty S, Crothers P. Similar labelling, similar packaging. Aust Pharmacist 1995; 14(8): 490–5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Evaluation procedure established to reduce errors linked to new drugs. Pharm J 2002; 268 (7187): 274

  35. Eastham SJ. Not the only cause of errors [letter]. Pharm J 2002; 268 (7190): 400

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lambert BL. Predicting look-alike and sound-alike medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1997; 54(10): 1161–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lambert BL, Chang KY, Lin SJ. Effect of orthographic and phonological similarity on false recognition of drug names. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52(12): 1843–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bates DW. A 40-year-old woman who noticed a medication error. JAMA 2001; 285(24): 3134–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. FIP approves policies on medication errors and counterfeit medicines. Pharm J 1999 Sept 18; 263: 460–463

  40. Peterson GM, Wu MS, Bergin JK. Pharmacists’s attitudes towards dispensing errors: their causes and prevention. J Clin Pharm Ther 1999; 24(1): 57–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Davis NM, Cohen MR. Counselling reduces dispensing accidents. Am Pharm 1992; NS32(10): 22

    Google Scholar 

  42. Abood RR. Errors in pharmacy practice. US Pharmacist 1996; 21(Pt 3): 122–32

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krska J, Upton D. The end of one era and the start of a new. Pharm Pract 2002 Oct; 324

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kaushal R, Bates DW. Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit? Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11(3): 261–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Runciman WB. Lessons form the Australian Patient Safety Foundation: setting up a national patient safety surveillance system: is this the right model? Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11(3): 246–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Landis NT. Illinois revises requirements for error records. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000 Feb 15; 57: 319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Leape LL. Error in medicine. JAMA 1994; 272(23): 1851–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cousins D, Clarkson A, Conroy S, et al. Medication errors in children: an eight year review using press reports. Paed Perinatal Drug Therapy 2002; 5(2): 52–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the participating pharmacies and the individuals involved for their assistance in carrying out this project.

This project was funded by the Department of Health, Directorate of Health and Social Care North, through the Hull and East Riding Pharmacy Research Network. Dr Wong’s post is funded by the UK Department of Health Public Health Career Scientist Award.

This project won the GlaxoSmithKline Best Oral Presentation Award at the UK Clinical Pharmacy Association Winter Symposium 2002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C.K. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chua, SS., Wong, I.C., Edmondson, H. et al. A Feasibility Study for Recording of Dispensing Errors and ‘Near Misses’ in Four UK Primary Care Pharmacies. Drug-Safety 26, 803–813 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200326110-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200326110-00005

Keywords

Navigation