Prostheses for primary total hip replacement. A critical appraisal of the literature

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Fall;11(4):770-8. doi: 10.1017/s026646230000920x.

Abstract

Eighty-one published papers on the performance of prostheses in total hip replacement were appraised. Sound methodology was demonstrated in 1 of 8 randomized controlled trials and 4 of 17 nonrandomized comparative studies. Of 56 case series without controls, 32 met the appraisal criteria, but these are intrinsically less useful. The published literature does not provide solid evidence for the superiority of cement-free or hybrid prostheses over modern cemented types.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone Cements / standards
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects
  • Hip Prosthesis / classification
  • Hip Prosthesis / standards*
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Research Design
  • Selection Bias
  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical*

Substances

  • Bone Cements