Skip to main content
We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you.
More info
You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our
cookies policy
.
Subscribe
Log In
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via ASPPS
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
Basket
Search
More
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Authors
About
Search for this keyword
Advanced search
Close
More
Main menu
Latest content
Current issue
Archive
Authors
About
Subscribe
Log in
More
Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via ASPPS
Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
Username
*
Password
*
Forgot your log in details?
Register a new account?
Forgot
your user name or password?
BMJ Journals
More
You are here
Home
topic
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Special collections
QSHC Guidelines
Email alerts
QSHC Guidelines
Special collections
/
QSHC Guidelines
Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
D P
Stevens
BMJ Quality & Safety
Oct 2005,
14
(5)
314;
DOI:
10.1136/qshc.2005.016311
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
F
Davidoff
,
P
Batalden
BMJ Quality & Safety
Oct 2005,
14
(5)
319-325;
DOI:
10.1136/qshc.2005.014787
CLINICAL
Drugs and medicines
Emergency medicine
Evidence based practice
Changing physician behavior
Clinical decision making
Clinical prediction rules
Critical appraisal literature
Effectiveness of care
Efficiency of care
Equity of care
Getting research into practice
Guidelines
Literature searching
Teaching EBM
Nursing
Case management
Chronic disease / disability nursing
Community nursing / community based care
Pharmacology and therapeutics
NON-CLINICAL
Ethics
Informed consent
Research and publication ethics
Health informatics
Health policy
(3)
Healthcare improvement and patient safety
Access, care
Accreditation
Adverse events
Change management
Chronic illness care
Clinical audit
Clinical governance
Clinical guidelines
Clinical risk
Collaoratives
Competencies
Complexity science
Culture, safety
Doctors' performance
Errors, healthcare
Fitness to practise
Flow
Healthcare dispariety
High reliabiltiy
Hospital ratings
Indicators and performance management
Inefficiencies
Leadership
Lean production
Macrosystems, Care
Medical error
Medication error
Medicines error
Microsystems, Care
Outcomes
Patient safety
Patient-centered, care
Productivity
Protocols
Quality control
Quality improvement
Quality improvement tools
Quality of life and health status
Rapid response systems
Root cause analysis, error
Service improvement
Shared decision making
Standards
Supervision
Surgical mortality
Teams
Journalology
Medical careers
Teaching
Medical education
History taking and the physical examination
Postgraduate
Undergraduate
Medical management
Doctors' morale and well being
Patients
Statistics and research methods
Special collections
BMJQS Heroes and martyrs of quality and safety
(32)
BMJQS Noteworthy articles
(78)
Editor's choice
(116)
Guidelines, Recommendations and Consensus Statements
Open access
(460)
Press releases
(50)
QSHC Crisis management in anaesthesia
(26)
QSHC Guidelines
(2)
QSHC Q lines
(18)
