Skip to main content
We use cookies to improve our service and to tailor our content and advertising to you. More info You can manage your cookie settings via your browser at any time. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our cookies policy.
Viewing from: MIT Libraries

BMJ Journals

  • Subscribe
  • Log In More
    Log in via Institution
    Log in via OpenAthens
    Log in via ASPPS

    Log in using your username and password

    For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
    Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
    Forgot your user name or password?
  • Basket
  • Search More
    Advanced search
BMJ Quality & Safety
  • Latest content
  • Current issue
  • Archive
  • Authors
  • About

Advanced search

  • Close More

    Main menu

    • Latest content
    • Current issue
    • Archive
    • Authors
    • About
  • Subscribe
  • Log in More
    Log in via Institution
    Log in via OpenAthens
    Log in via ASPPS

    Log in using your username and password

    For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts
    Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
    Forgot your user name or password?
  • BMJ Journals More
    You are viewing from: MIT Libraries

You are here

  • Home
  • topic
  • Quality and Safety in Health Care
  • Special collections
  • QSHC Guidelines
Email alerts

QSHC Guidelines

  • Special collections /
  • QSHC Guidelines
  • Why new guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now?
    D P Stevens
    BMJ Quality & Safety Oct 2005, 14 (5) 314; DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016311
  • Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project
    F Davidoff, P Batalden
    BMJ Quality & Safety Oct 2005, 14 (5) 319-325; DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787
  • CLINICAL
    • Drugs and medicines
    • Emergency medicine
    • Evidence based practice
      • Changing physician behavior
      • Clinical decision making
      • Clinical prediction rules
      • Critical appraisal literature
      • Effectiveness of care
      • Efficiency of care
      • Equity of care
      • Getting research into practice
      • Guidelines
      • Literature searching
      • Teaching EBM
    • Nursing
      • Case management
      • Chronic disease / disability nursing
      • Community nursing / community based care
    • Pharmacology and therapeutics
  • NON-CLINICAL
    • Ethics
      • Informed consent
      • Research and publication ethics
    • Health informatics
    • Health policy (3)
    • Healthcare improvement and patient safety
      • Access, care
      • Accreditation
      • Adverse events
      • Change management
      • Chronic illness care
      • Clinical audit
      • Clinical governance
      • Clinical guidelines
      • Clinical risk
      • Collaoratives
      • Competencies
      • Complexity science
      • Culture, safety
      • Doctors' performance
      • Errors, healthcare
      • Fitness to practise
      • Flow
      • Healthcare dispariety
      • High reliabiltiy
      • Hospital ratings
      • Indicators and performance management
      • Inefficiencies
      • Leadership
      • Lean production
      • Macrosystems, Care
      • Medical error
      • Medication error
      • Medicines error
      • Microsystems, Care
      • Outcomes
      • Patient safety
      • Patient-centered, care
      • Productivity
      • Protocols
      • Quality control
      • Quality improvement
      • Quality improvement tools
      • Quality of life and health status
      • Rapid response systems
      • Root cause analysis, error
      • Service improvement
      • Shared decision making
      • Standards
      • Supervision
      • Surgical mortality
      • Teams
    • Journalology
    • Medical careers
      • Teaching
    • Medical education
      • History taking and the physical examination
      • Postgraduate
      • Undergraduate
    • Medical management
      • Doctors' morale and well being
    • Patients
    • Statistics and research methods
  • Special collections
    • BMJQS Heroes and martyrs of quality and safety (32)
    • BMJQS Noteworthy articles (78)
    • Editor's choice (116)
    • Guidelines, Recommendations and Consensus Statements
    • Open access (460)
    • Press releases (50)
    • QSHC Crisis management in anaesthesia (26)
    • QSHC Guidelines (2)
    • QSHC Q lines (18)
  • The Health Foundation
  • Content
    • Latest content
    • Current issue
    • Archive
    • Browse by topic
    • Most read articles
    • Responses
  • Journal
    • About
    • Editorial board
    • Sign up for email alerts
    • Subscribe
  • Authors
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit an article
    • Editorial policies
    • Open Access at BMJ
    • BMJ Author Hub
  • Help
    • Contact us
    • Reprints
    • Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Feedback form
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Website Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Contact BMJ

Online: ISSN 2044-5423Print: ISSN 2044-5415
Copyright © 2019 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & the Health Foundation. All rights reserved.
京ICP备15042040号-3