Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Should we consider non-compliance a medical error?
Free
  1. N Barber
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor N Barber, Centre for Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, 29–39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK;
 nick.barber{at}ulsop.ac.uk

Abstract

Non-compliance is an extensive intractable problem. This paper argues that we can gain significant insight into non-compliance if we apply theories developed to explain human error in organisations. The resultant framework encompasses intentional and unintentional non-compliance, shifts blame from the patient, and recognises the influence of other factors, including organisational ones. There are also consequences for the measurement of compliance and new strategies to improve it. Terminology will need to be addressed, particularly whether intentional non-compliance by a patient should be considered an error. If empirical research supports the arguments in this paper then, with some further theory development, the application of human error theory will offer a useful new approach to understanding and reducing undesired non-compliance.

  • non-compliance
  • medical error
  • human error theory
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • Action points
      Tim Albert