Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effectiveness of quality improvement: learning from evaluations
  1. K Walshe1,
  2. T Freeman2
  1. 1Reader in Public Management and Director of Research, Manchester Centre for Healthcare Management, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Lecturer, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr K Walshe, Manchester Centre for Healthcare Management, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
 kieran.walshe{at}man.ac.uk

Abstract

The effectiveness of many quality improvement interventions has been studied, and research suggests that most have highly variable effects which depend heavily on the context in which they are used and the way they are implemented. This has three important implications. Firstly, it means that the approach to quality improvement used in an organisation probably matters less than how and by whom it is used. Rather than taking up, trying, and then discarding a succession of different quality improvement techniques, organisations should probably choose one carefully and then persevere to make it work. Secondly, future research into quality improvement interventions should be directed more at understanding how and why they work—the determinants of effectiveness—rather than measuring whether they work. Thirdly, some element of evaluation should be incorporated into every quality improvement programme so that its effectiveness can be monitored and the information can be used to improve the systems for improvement.

  • quality improvement
  • evaluation techniques
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.