Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 13 May 2016
- Published on: 13 May 2016
- Published on: 13 May 2016
- Published on: 13 May 2016GRiP: did it have an effect?Show More
Dear Editor
Milne and Hill suggest the 'Getting Research into Practice' programme may have contributed to the decline in surgery for glue ear that we have reported. We cannot, however provide any evidence to support this suggestion. The rate of decline in surgery throughout England was similar to that observed in 13 former health districts in the Oxford/Anglia region. The ratio of change in rates after 1992 over the...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 13 May 2016Response to Milne and HillShow More
Dear Editor
Milne and Hill raise an interesting hypothesis - that the decline in surgical rates may have been due to a programme of Getting Research Into Practice. We intend to test this hypothesis by comparing our data with that for the whole of England and, within the area of our study, to compare the two Berkshire districts with districts in the former East Anglian region. We will report the results on this site...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 13 May 2016GRiP and the decline in surgery for glue earShow More
Dear Editor
Black and Hutchings present an intriguing account of the rise and fall of glue ear surgery in two English regions.[1] They speculate that the acceleration of the decline from 1992 may have been due to the Effective Health Care bulletin on glue ear, helped by five "contextual features". One of these was the concurrent structural change to the NHS, arising from the introduction of health care commis...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.