Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Guideline adherence
Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation
  1. R Peveler
  1. Correspondence to:
 Professor R Peveler, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton SO14 0YG, UK;
 r.c.peveler{at}soton.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Variation in professional practice is a complex issue, but probably largely reflects differences in training, and there is evidence that guidelines and education alone have little impact on professional behaviour.

The increasing recognition of depressive illness as a major public health problem1 has intensified research efforts and also highlighted the extent of variation in professional practice. Because depressive illness is so prevalent, most cases are not managed by specialists. Although healthcare systems differ, general medical practitioners are the professional group most often involved. The training in mental health provided for such doctors is variable, but usually does not mirror the high prevalence of the common conditions—for example, in the UK less than half of general practitioners may receive specialist training experience in mental health. There is similar variation in the training of other professional groups. It is therefore no surprise that there is variation in professional practice both within and between such groups, as shown by Tiemeier et al2 in their vignette study published in …

View Full Text