Responses

Download PDFPDF

Influencing sceptical staff to become supporters of service improvement: a qualitative study of doctors’ and managers’ views
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    'Sceptics or realists' - Authors' response

    Dear Editor

    We note Dr Checkland’s comments on our paper on scepticism with interest.[1] In response, we do not believe that the paper argues that it is not legitimate for staff to be sceptical; indeed, we acknowledge the fact that scepticism can be useful in highlighting gaps and flaws in improvement initiatives. Nevertheless, the study – based on interviews that centred on listening to the opinions of others...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Sceptics or realists

    Dear Editor

    The article by Gollop et al.[1] raises an interesting question: does labelling a programme of change an "improvement" programme mean that such a programme will automatically deliver improvements?

    I am disturbed by the implication that simply because something is "a key component of the government's strategy to modernise the NHS and make it more accessible to patients" it is therefor...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.