Article Text

Download PDFPDF
European Working Time Directive legislation
Developing and implementing organisational practice that delivers better, safer care
  1. W Reid
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr W Reid
 London Deanery, 20 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1DZ, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The impact of organisational changes such as the European Working Time Directive on doctors’ hours should be evaluated in terms of its effect on the quality and safety of patient care

Significant improvements in patient care usually require major organisational change. In reality, this inevitably means disruption and upheaval of working practices that have evolved over decades. The prospect of change creates uncertainty and an inertia that gets in the way of progress and improvement. Arguments for the status quo can often supersede the argument for change.

In the UK—and presumably throughout Europe too—hospitals are being thoroughly exercised by the urgent need to implement the European Working Time Directive (EWTD).1 This states that the working week must be limited to 48 hours. Because doctors have traditionally worked excessively long hours, the EWTD is being applied to them in stages. But, by 1 August 2004, doctors may only work 58 hours per week. The EWTD is set within the framework of Health and Safety at Work legislation. This makes sense. Long hours of work contribute to high stress levels within the profession2 and overwork is a factor in adverse clinical incidents.3 And it must be healthier to work for 58 than for 100 hours per week.

The organisational changes needed to create systems in which doctors’ working hours are within the limits …

View Full Text

Linked Articles