Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The effect of specialist care within the first year on subsequent outcomes in 24 232 adults with new-onset diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study
  1. F A McAlister,
  2. S R Majumdar,
  3. D T Eurich,
  4. J A Johnson
  1. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr S R Majumdar
 2E307 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R7; me2.majumdar{at}


Background: Although specialty care has been shown to improve short-term outcomes in patients hospitalised with acute medical conditions, its effect on patients with chronic conditions treated in the ambulatory care setting is less clear.

Objective: To examine whether specialty care (ie, consultative care provided by an endocrinologist or a general internist in concert with a patient’s primary care doctor) within the first year of diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes after the first year for adults with diabetes mellitus treated as outpatients.

Design: Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data.

Setting: The province of Saskatchewan, Canada.

Sample: 24 232 adults newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between 1991 and 2001.

Method: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analyses used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates, propensity scores and case mix variables (demographic, disease severity and comorbidities). In addition, restriction analyses examined the effect of specialist care in low-risk subgroups.

Results: The median age of patients was 61 years, and over a mean follow-up of 4.9 years 2932 (12%) died. Patients receiving specialty care were younger, had a greater burden of comorbidities, and visited doctors more often before and after their diabetes diagnosis (all p⩽0.001). Compared with patients seen by primary care doctors alone, patients seen by specialists and primary care doctors were more likely to receive recommended treatments (all p⩽0.001), but were more likely to die (13.1% v 11.7%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.27). This association persisted even in patients without comorbidities or target organ damage (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.34).

Conclusion: Specialty care was associated with better disease-specific process measures but not improved survival in adults with diabetes cared for in ambulatory care settings.

  • ACE, antiotensin-converting enzyme

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding: DTE holds a full-time studentship in health research from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). SRM and FAM receive salary from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the AHFMR. FAM holds the University of Alberta/Merck Frosst/Aventis Chair in patient health management. JAJ is a health scholar with the AHFMR and holds a Canada Research Chair in diabetes health outcomes. JAJ is the chairman of a New Emerging Team (NET) grant to the Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes (ACHORD). The ACHORD NET grant is sponsored by the Canadian Diabetes Association, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, The Kidney Foundation of Canada, the CIHR—Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes, and the CIHR—Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health. None of these sponsoring agencies had any input into the design, conduct or reporting of this study.

  • Competing interests: None.

Linked Articles