Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery
  1. A N Healey,
  2. C P Primus,
  3. M Koutantji
  1. Imperial College, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A N Healey
 Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Clinical Safety Research Unit, Imperial College, University of London, 10th Floor QEQM, St Mary’s Hospital, Praed Street, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK; a.healey{at}


Background: To enhance safety in surgery, it is necessary to develop a variety of tools for measuring and evaluating the system of work. One important consideration for safety in any high-risk work is the frequency and effect of distraction and interruption.

Aim: To quantify distraction and interruption to the sterile surgical team in urology.

Methods: Observation of the behaviour of the surgical team and their task activity determined distraction and interruption recorded. Using an ordinal scale, an observer rated each salient distraction or interruption observed in relation to the team’s involvement.

Results: The frequency of events and their attached ratings were high, deriving from varying degrees of equipment, procedure and environment problems, telephones, bleepers and conversations.

Discussion: With further refinement and testing, this method may be useful for distinguishing ordinal levels of work interference in surgery and helpful in raising awareness of its origin for postoperative surgical team debriefing.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests: None declared.

Linked Articles

  • Quality lines
    David P Stevens