Objectives: To measure the patient safety attitudes of trainee physicians at an academic paediatric hospital.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: An academic paediatric hospital.
Participants: 209 trainee physicians based at the academic paediatric hospital in January 2004.
Main outcome measures: Patient safety attitudes of trainee physicians measured using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (Inpatient Version) and a specific trainee survey.
Results: In the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, responses were most positive in areas associated with independent care: job satisfaction (mean factor score = 77.5) safety climate (76.1), working conditions (75.6), perception of management (70.4) and less positively in areas associated with interdependent care: teamwork climate (64.6) and stress recognition (59.1). In the trainee survey, following a principal component analysis to identify summary factors, responses were most positive in the independent areas of clinical supervision and support (75.0), communication with their immediate senior physician (65.5) and orientation of new personnel (63.9), and less positive in the interdependent areas of handoffs and multiple services, (58.1), role identification during codes (51.0) and support following an adverse event (42.8). The combined independent factor scores were higher than the interdependent (difference = 17.9, 95% CI 16.1 to 19.7, p<0.001). Fellows reported higher independent factor scores than residents (5.5, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.9, p = 0.001), but not for the interdependent scores (−0.5, 95% CI −3.6 to 2.7, p = 0.767).
Conclusions: Trainees appear comfortable with caring independently for patients but less so caring interdependently. With experience, trainee physicians may experience improvement in their ability to act independently but not interdependently. Recently developed patient safety culture instruments may enable additional understanding of what could be implemented to make improvements.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
▸ Additional appendices and a sample survey form are published online only at http://qshc.bmj.com/content/vol18/issue6
Funding GP was supported in writing this paper by the Commonwealth Fund, a national, private foundation based in New York City that supports independent research on health and social issues. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Commonwealth Fund, its director, officers or staff.
Competing interests None.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.