Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Learning from MARQuIS: future direction of quality and safety in hospital care in the European Union
  1. O Groene1,
  2. N Klazinga2,
  3. K Walshe3,
  4. C Cucic4,
  5. C D Shaw5,
  6. R Suñol1
  1. 1
    Avedis Donabedian University Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain, and CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)
  2. 2
    Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Social Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  3. 3
    Herbert Simon Institute for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK
  4. 4
    The Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement, the Netherlands
  5. 5
    European Society for Quality in Health Care, Limerick, Ireland
  1. O Groene, Avedis Donabedian University Institute, UAB, Provenza 293 Pral, 08037 Barcelona, Spain; ogroene{at}fadq.org

Abstract

This article summarises the significant lessons to be drawn from, and the policy implications of, the findings of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) project—a part of the suite of research projects intended to support policy established by the European Commission through its Sixth Framework Programme. The article first reviews the findings of MARQuIS and their implications for healthcare providers (and particularly for hospitals), and then addresses the broader policy implications for member states of the European Union (EU) and for the commission itself. Against the background of the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme, it then outlines a number of future areas for research to inform policy and practice in quality and safety in Europe. The article concludes that at this stage, a unique EU-wide quality improvement system for hospitals does not seem to be feasible or effective. Because of possible future community action in this field, attention should focus on the use of existing research on quality and safety strategies in healthcare, with the aim of combining soft measures to accelerate mutual learning. Concrete measures should be considered only in areas for which there is substantial evidence and effective implementation can be ensured.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research was funded by the European Commission through its “Scientific Support to Policies” action under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research for the research project “Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS)” (SP21-CT-2004-513712).

  • Competing interests: None.