Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Progress in paediatric electronic prescribing: good, better, best
  1. Kathleen E Walsh1,2
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kathleen E Walsh, Benedict Second Floor, UMass Medical Center 55 North Lake, St Worcester, MA 01655, USA; walshk02{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

As a physician trainee, I used several different electronic health records at different institutions. In an e-prescribing training environment, I once wrote an electronic order for a large overdose of digoxin for a neonatal test patient. I was disturbed to find that the electronic prescribing system printed that order without any warnings or alerts because it fit within the normal adult dosing limits for the medication. For special patient populations, such as children, electronic health records, particularly prescribing systems, require special features.1 Children have higher rates of potentially dangerous medication errors than adult patients, due to the complexity of paediatric medication ordering with individualised weight-based dosing.2 Electronic prescribing systems designed for adult patients may not contain the paediatric decision support needed to prevent paediatric medication errors or may even cause new paediatric errors to occur.

The Jani et al paper (see page 337) raises several important issues regarding the effect of electronic prescribing on paediatric dosing errors.3 Prominent among them are: first, the role of clinician decision support in electronic prescribing; …

View Full Text


  • Funding Supported by a Robert Wood Johnson Physician Faculty Scholar award.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles