Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is highly prevalent in some Alaska Native and American Indian populations. Quality indicators for RA have been proposed, but these have not been widely implemented or used to assess RA care in Alaska Native or American Indian populations.
Methods Medical records were included if they met the following criteria: RA diagnosed before October 2000 fulfilling American College of Rheumatology classification criteria; all care for RA at the Alaska Native Medical Center. Records were reviewed for a 5-year period to determine compliance with eight quality indicators defined by the Arthritis Foundation Quality Indicator Program. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyse associations with quality of care.
Results There were 106 individuals included in the study. The highest-scoring measures were folic acid prescription if on methotrexate (93.3%) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescription (90.6%). The lowest scoring measure was radiographs of both hands and feet (16.0%). In multivariate analysis, the factor most strongly associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescriptions, annual exam for RA and hand radiographs was at least one visit with a rheumatologist.
Conclusions Quality of care for RA varies by measure and is better for patients who see a rheumatologist. These data provide an initial evaluation of RA quality of care in a unique minority population with an integrated healthcare system.
- quality of healthcare
- North American
- chronic disease
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This project was supported by grant number R03 HS015625 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics review was provided by Alaska Area IRB.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.