Background Data of the German Competence Network for Community-Acquired Pneumonia showed a gap between the recommendations of the national guideline for management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the routine care. We developed and evaluated an implementation strategy to improve the quality of care of patients with CAP.
Method A prospective, randomised, controlled trail was conducted within CAPNETZ. In four local clinical centres (LCC), the guideline was implemented by different strategies. The other four LCC served as control group. Indicators for guideline adherence comprised initial site of treatment, initial antibiotic treatment and duration of antibiotic treatment. As patient-related factors, we assessed the effect of guideline implementation on 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay.
Results Active guideline implementation yielded an increased proportion of guideline adherence to the length of antibiotic treatment in outpatients (+9.2%), the recommended antibiotic treatment (+5.6%) and duration of antibiotic treatment in inpatients (+5.0%) compared with baseline. In contrast, the proportion of patients in the control group, treated according to the guideline, decreased in the same period by 7.9%, 2.9% and 4.7%, respectively. None of these results was statistically significant. Decrease of CAP-related mortality was higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (2.9% vs 0.5%, ns).
Conclusion This study showed improvements in the process of care after implementation of a guideline for treating CAP. Further strategies, such as quality improvement cycles and medical practice audits, may enhance this effect.
- Community-acquired pneumonia
- quality of care
- randomised controlled trail
- clinical guidelines
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
See Commentary, p 471
Thanks to Mithat Koca, Antje Tessmer, Frank Kunitz, Torsten Bauer, Norbert Suttorp (Berlin); Santiago Ewig, Gernot Rohde (Bochum); Matthias Pletz (Hannover); Klaus Dalhoff, Meral Tosun, Petra Heyer (Lübeck); Manfred Schack, Judith Pischer, Adrian Gillisen (Leipzig); Tom Schaberg, Iris Hering (Rotenburg); Christian Schumann (Ulm), Torsten Illmann, Michael Wallner, Michael Weber (IT) Grit Barten, Ludmilla Gosmann, Michaelea Finsel (main office); and all study nurses.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The ethic committees of the participating universities of the competence network CAPNETZ approved the study protocol and all patients included in CAPNETZ gave informed consent to participation.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.