Introduction Adverse drug events (ADEs) are frequent and pose an important risk for patients treated with drugs. Fortunately, a substantial part of ADEs is preventable, and computerised physician order entry with a sophisticated clinical decision support system may be used to reach this goal.
Objective To develop a new automated system that could improve the quality of medication surveillance. The system should focus on detecting patients at risk for an ADE by combining data from the hospital information system and computerised physician order entry (drug prescription data, drug–drug interaction alerts, clinical chemical laboratory parameters, demographic features), using clinical rules.
Methods The clinical rules were formulated in a multidisciplinary team, based on seven risk categories. The new system was composed in a guideline-based decision support framework consisting of both a guideline development module and a decision support module. A total of 121 clinical rules were built into the system. Validation of the system and a proof of principle test were performed.
Results The adverse drug event alerting system (ADEAS) was developed and validated successfully. The proof of principle test showed that ADEAS has potential clinical usefulness. ADEAS generated alerts and detected additional potential risk situations, which were not generated by the conventional medication surveillance.
Conclusion We developed a pharmacy decision support system ADEAS that focusses on the detection of situations prone to lead to an ADE and might help clinicians to take timely corrective interventions and thereby can prevent patient harm.
- Adverse drug events
- clinical decision support system
- computerised physician order entry
- clinical rules
- computerised alert system
- hospital pharmacy
- combining drug and laboratory data
- medication safety
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding This study was financially supported by the Dutch Society of Hospital Pharmacists (NVZA), the Dutch Society of Hospital Physicians (OMS) and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.