Background Strategies are needed to contain emergency-department attendance. Quality of care in general practice might influence the use of emergency departments, including management of patients with chronic conditions and access to consultations.
Aim The aim was to determine whether emergency‐department attendance rates are lower for practices with higher quality and outcomes framework performance and lower for practices with better patient reported access.
Design A cross-sectional study.
Setting Two English primary-care trusts, Leicester City and Leicestershire County and Rutland, with 145 general practices.
Method Using data on attendances at emergency departments in 2006/2007 and 2007/2008, a practice attendance rate was calculated for each practice. In a hierarchical negative binomial regression model, practice population characteristics (deprivation, proportion of patients aged 65 or over, ethnicity, gender) and practice characteristics (total list size, distance from the emergency department, quality and outcomes framework points, and variables measuring satisfaction with access) were included as potential explanatory variables.
Results In both years, greater deprivation, shorter distance from the central emergency department, lower practice list size, white ethnicity and lower satisfaction with practice telephone access were associated with higher emergency-department attendance rates.
Conclusions Performance as indicated by the quality and outcomes framework did not predict rates of attendance at emergency departments, but satisfaction with telephone access did. Consideration should be given to improving access to some general practices to contain the use of emergency departments.
- Primary care
- emergency department
- general practice
- quality of care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding National Institute for Health Research. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Competing interests (1) AR and MH are employees of Leicestershire County and Rutland Trust, and MH and JB are employees of University Hospitals of Leicester Trust that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; (2) AR's spouse is an employee of Leicestershire County and Rutland Trust; and (3) RB, MJB, SC, RH, AW, SA and JC‐S have no non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.