Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Hospital discharge documentation and risk of rehospitalisation
  1. Luke O Hansen1,
  2. Amy Strater2,
  3. Lisa Smith3,
  4. Jungwha Lee4,
  5. Robert Press5,
  6. Norman Ward6,
  7. John A Weigelt7,
  8. Peter Boling8,
  9. Mark V Williams1
  1. 1Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2Vanguard Health Systems, Chicago Illinois, USA
  3. 3University Health System Consortium, Oakbrook, Illinois, USA
  4. 4Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  5. 5NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
  6. 6Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vermont, USA
  7. 7Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee Wisconsin, USA
  8. 8Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Luke O Hansen, Division of Hospital Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 750 N. Lakeshore Drive, 11th floor, Suite 187, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; luke.hansen1{at}


Background Avoidable hospital readmission is a focus of quality improvement efforts. The effectiveness of individual elements of the standard discharge process in reducing rehospitalisation is unknown.

Methods The authors conducted a case-control study of 1039 patients experiencing rehospitalisation within 30 days of discharge and 981 non-rehospitalised patients matched on admission diagnosis, discharge disposition, and severity of illness. In separate models for each discharge process component, the authors measured the relationship between readmission and discharge summary completion, contents of discharge summary, completion of discharge instructions, contents of discharge instructions, presence of caregiver for discharge instruction, completion of medication reconciliation, and arrangement of ambulatory follow-up prior to discharge.

Results Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, including severity of illness and discharge disposition, the study failed to find an association between readmission and most components of the discharge process. There was no association between readmission and medication reconciliation, transmission of discharge summary to an outpatient physician, or documentation of any specific aspect of discharge instruction. Associations were found between readmission and discharge with followup arranged (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.21; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.37) and increasing number of medicines (adjusted OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04).

Conclusions Documentation of discharge process components in the medical record may not reflect actual discharge process activities. Alternatively, mandated discharge processes are ineffective in preventing readmission. The observed absence of an association between discharge documentation and readmission indicates that discharge quality improvement initiatives should target metrics of discharge process quality beyond improving rates of documentation.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Hospital Medicine. Washington, DC, 8 April 2010.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.