Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P284 A Survey Of The Updating Of Clinical Practice Guidelines In China
  1. Y Chen1,2,
  2. X Wang1,2,
  3. Q Wu1,2,
  4. Q Wang1,2,
  5. D Wei1,2,
  6. L Yao1,2,
  7. F Liang1,2,
  8. M Wang3,
  9. K Yang1,2
  1. 1Evidence-Based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
  2. 2Chinese GRADE Center, Lanzhou, China
  3. 3The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China


Background Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should be updated when new evidence suggests the need for modification of clinically important recommendations. Some guideline handbooks suggest that CPGs should update every 2 to 5 years. Little is known about the updating of CPGs in China.

Objectives To investigate the current situation of the updating of CPGs in China.

Methods We searched WangFang, VIP, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) up to December 2012. And then we screened all included papers.

Results A total of 380 Chinese CPGs were included. There were 345 of guidelines (91%) had not been updated. 35 (9%) were updated and the average update cycle of them was 5.6 years(from 1 to 9 years). No guideline described the details of methods of uptodate .

Conclusions Updating the CPGs is important for the better dissemination and utilisation. But in China, most of the CPGs had never been updated, and the average update cycle (5.6 years) of the updated is longer than international standard (5 years). We suggest Chinese guideline developers should pay more attention to the updating the guideline in time.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.