Article Text

A system-wide approach to explaining variation in potentially avoidable emergency admissions: national ecological study
  1. Alicia O'Cathain1,
  2. Emma Knowles1,
  3. Ravi Maheswaran1,
  4. Tim Pearson1,
  5. Janette Turner1,
  6. Enid Hirst2,
  7. Steve Goodacre1,
  8. Jon Nicholl1
  1. 1Medical Care Research Unit, ScHARR, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  2. 2Sheffield Emergency Care Forum, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Alicia O'Cathain, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; a.ocathain{at}


Background Some emergency admissions can be avoided if acute exacerbations of health problems are managed by the range of health services providing emergency and urgent care.

Aim To identify system-wide factors explaining variation in age sex adjusted admission rates for conditions rich in avoidable admissions.

Design National ecological study.

Setting 152 emergency and urgent care systems in England.

Methods Hospital Episode Statistics data on emergency admissions were used to calculate an age sex adjusted admission rate for conditions rich in avoidable admissions for each emergency and urgent care system in England for 2008–2011.

Results There were 3 273 395 relevant admissions in 2008–2011, accounting for 22% of all emergency admissions. The mean age sex adjusted admission rate was 2258 per year per 100 000 population, with a 3.4-fold variation between systems (1268 and 4359). Factors beyond the control of health services explained the majority of variation: unemployment rates explained 72%, with urban/rural status explaining further variation (R2=75%). Factors related to emergency departments, hospitals, emergency ambulance services and general practice explained further variation (R2=85%): the attendance rate at emergency departments, percentage of emergency department attendances converted to admissions, percentage of emergency admissions staying less than a day, percentage of emergency ambulance calls not transported to hospital and perceived access to general practice within 48 h.

Conclusions Interventions to reduce avoidable admissions should be targeted at deprived communities. Better use of emergency departments, ambulance services and primary care could further reduce avoidable emergency admissions.

  • Emergency Department
  • Prehospital Care
  • Primary Care
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: