Article Text

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Working smarter, not harder
  1. Rick Iedema
  1. Correspondence to Professor Rick Iedema, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Darlinghurst campus, Sydney, Australia; rick.iedema{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The Hayes, Batalden and Goldmann piece is an important contribution to the debate about what exactly is practice improvement. Most practice improvement thinking is anchored in the ‘innovation’ paradigm, and this paradigm is predominantly ‘gadget thinking’. Others’ solutions are to be adopted here because they produce great outcomes elsewhere. Except now we have to figure out how we can get the gadget to work. Few commentators have been game to shift towards acknowledging that care practices are now too complex for ‘gadget thinking’. Hayes and colleagues are an exception. They propose that frontline professionals themselves need to become smarter at ‘codesigning’ solutions that suit their unique contexts …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles