You are here

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original research
Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods

Authors

  • Lisa M McElroy Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Rebeca Khorzad Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Anna P Nannicelli Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Alexandra R Brown Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Daniela P Ladner Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Jane L Holl Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lisa M McElroy, Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 North St. Clair Street, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; lmcelroy{at}mcw.edu
View Full Text

Citation

McElroy LM, Khorzad R, Nannicelli AP, et al
Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods
BMJ Quality & Safety 2016;25:329-336.

Publication history

  • Received February 27, 2015
  • Revised June 18, 2015
  • Accepted June 21, 2015
  • First published July 13, 2015.
Online issue publication 
May 13, 2016

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/