Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Ethnography as a methodological descriptor: the editors' reply
  1. Mary Dixon-Woods1,
  2. Kaveh G Shojania2
  1. 1 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Professor Mary Dixon-Woods, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2nd Floor, Adrian Building, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; md11{at}leicester.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dr Jowsey worries that the use of the term ‘ethnographic’ in the title of a recent short report by Lamba et al 1 of a study of patient safety in team rounds risks watering down the meaning of ethnography as a research methodology. The data for the study were collected by one observer, who used a structured data collection form to record patient safety issues that were brought up or occurred during team rounds, as well as identifying any consequences and whether the issue was actionable. The observational data regarding issues were categorised using a set of thematic categories derived from the London Protocol, and were summarised using descriptive statistics.

Jowsey notes that the Lamba et al 1 article identifies in its title and methods …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles