Article info
PDFInnovations in Education
Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases
- Correspondence to Dr Andrea Leep Hunderfund, Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA; leep.andrea{at}mayo.edu
Citation
Validity evidence for Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R) scores: consequences of rater number and type using neurology cases
Publication history
- Received August 7, 2018
- Revised February 5, 2019
- Accepted March 31, 2019
- First published April 17, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 18, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.