Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial
  1. Erik Lenguerrand1,
  2. Cathy Winter2,
  3. Dimitrios Siassakos3,
  4. Graeme MacLennan4,
  5. Karen Innes4,
  6. Pauline Lynch5,
  7. Alan Cameron6,
  8. Joanna Crofts2,
  9. Alison McDonald4,
  10. Kirsty McCormack4,
  11. Mark Forrest4,
  12. John Norrie7,
  13. Siladitya Bhattacharya8,
  14. Tim Draycott1,2
  1. 1 Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  2. 2 Department of Women’s Health and Children’s Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
  3. 3 Institute for Women’s Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom
  4. 4 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  5. 5 Maternity Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
  6. 6 Ian Donald Fetal Medicine Centre, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
  7. 7 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  8. 8 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Erik Lenguerrand, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK; erik.lenguerrand{at}bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective To assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<75mins).

Design Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting Twelve randomised maternity units with ≥900 births/year in Scotland. Three additional units were included in a supplementary analysis to assess the effect across Scotland. The intervention commenced in March 2014 with follow-up until September 2016.

Intervention The PROMPT training package (Second edition), with subsequent unit-level implementation of PROMPT courses for all maternity staff.

Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of term babies with Apgar<75mins.

Results 87 204 eligible births (99.2% with an Apgar score), of which 1291 infants had an Apgar<75mins were delivered in the 12 randomised maternity units. Two units did not implement the intervention. The overall Apgar<75mins rate observed in the 12 randomised units was 1.49%, increasing from 1.32% preintervention to 1.59% postintervention. Once adjusted for a secular time trend, the ‘intention-to-treat’ analysis indicated a moderate but non-significant reduction in the rate of term babies with an Apgar scores <75mins following PROMPT training (OR=0.79 95%CI(0.63 to 1.01)). However, some units implemented the intervention earlier than their allocated step, whereas others delayed the intervention. The content and authenticity of the implemented intervention varied widely at unit level. When the actual date of implementation of the intervention in each unit was considered in the analysis, there was no evidence of improvement (OR=1.01 (0.84 to 1.22)). No intervention effect was detected by broadening the analysis to include all 15 large Scottish maternity units. Units with a history of higher rates of Apgar<75mins maintained higher Apgar rates during the study (OR=2.09 (1.28 to 3.41)) compared with units with pre-study rates aligned to the national rate.

Conclusions PROMPT training, as implemented, had no effect on the rate of Apgar <75mins in Scotland during the study period. Local implementation at scale was found to be more difficult than anticipated. Further research is required to understand why the positive effects observed in other single-unit studies have not been replicated in Scottish maternity units, and how units can be best supported to locally implement the intervention authentically and effectively.

Trial registration number ISRCTN11640515.

  • intrapartum emergencies
  • training course
  • apgar score
  • stepped-wedge trial
  • obstetrics
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors All members of the THISTLE group were involved in the development of the study and contributed its implementation. CW, DS, JC and TD developed and coordinated the implementation of the intervention. EL designed and conducted the statistical analysis with the support of GM and JN. All authors contributed to the data interpretation, manuscript writing and review and approved its final version. SB is the chief investigator and SB and TD are the guarantors. EL, CW, GM, DS,PL, JN, SB and TD acquired the funding.

  • Funding The article outlines independent research funded by the Chief Scientist Office (CZH/4/893).

  • Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the authors and the study sponsor and funders have had no role in the study design, collection, management analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report and decision to submit the report for publication.

  • Competing interests EL is an employee of the University of Bristol which receives funding from PROMPT charity to pay part of EL’s salary. CW is seconded from North Bristol NHS Trust as the Lead Research Midwife to the PROMPT charity. DS is an invited member of GLOBE, an initiative funded by Ferring. TD is a Trustee of the PROMPT Maternity Foundation charity, which provides PROMPT Training. He is a consultant for Limbs & Things and Laerdal and paid speaker for Ferring Pharmaceuticals. CW, DS and JC are members of the PROMPT Maternity Foundation charity. The remaining authors have no competing interests.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained: REC reference 13/NS/0111.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement The study data are saved on the National Services Scotland Safe Haven, only accessible by ISD trained and approved member and will be archived as per ISD regulations. Further information on how to access these data and use the Safe Haven are available here: http://www.isdscotland.org/Products-and-Services/EDRIS/.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles