Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Role of practices and Clinical Commissioning Groups in measures of patient experience: analysis of routine data
  1. Mayam Gomez-Cano1,
  2. Emily Fletcher1,
  3. John L Campbell1,
  4. Marc Elliott2,
  5. Jenni Burt3,
  6. Gary Abel1
  1. 1 Medical School (Primary Care), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  2. 2 RAND Health, RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA
  3. 3 THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mayam Gomez-Cano, Medical School (Primary Care) Smeall Building St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK; m.c.gomez-cano{at}exeter.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Recent years have seen an increased focus on measuring how people experience health services to ensure that care and treatment is of the highest quality and safety.1 2 Better patient care experiences are associated with better adherence, clinical outcomes and patient safety, and with lower healthcare utilisation.3 4 In England, the national GP Patient Survey (GPPS) measures patients’ experience of primary care.5 As part of an NHS initiative to improve patient experience and facilitate patient-centred care, GPPS scores are currently reported at the level of general practices, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and nationally.

English CCGs are clinically led NHS bodies that commission local health care services. There were 209 CCGs in 2016, though there are now fewer, on account of recent practice-mergers. Although GPPS scores are reported for CCGs, little is known about the influence CCGs have on patient experience scores. We have previously shown that patient experience scores vary considerably between GPs within a practice, and that measures reported at practice level can mask this variation.6 The quality of care or patient experience delivered at any one practice may be influenced by drivers from higher organisations such as CCGs. Recently, CCGs have been shown to influence the rate and accuracy of ‘fast-track’ cancer referrals from English primary care.7 Here, we explore whether there was systematic variation in the quality of patient experience between CCGs compared with variability between practices themselves.

Methods

Data were analysed from 836 172 GPPS respondents in 2015/2016 (response rate 38.9%). The GPPS survey was conducted in two waves (July–September 2015 and January–March 2016). Full details of the survey development and methodology are published elsewhere.8

Patient experience measures

We focused on seven patient experience measures which have been commonly used …

View Full Text