You are here

Article info

Article menu
Original research
Choice architecture in physician–patient communication: a mixed-methods assessments of physicians’ competency

Authors

  • Joanna Hart Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Kuldeep Yadav Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Stephanie Szymanski Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Amy Summer Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Aaron Tannenbaum Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Julian Zlatev Negotiation, Organizations & Markets Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • David Daniels NUS Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Scott D Halpern Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joanna Hart, Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; joanna.hart{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu
View Full Text

Citation

Hart J, Yadav K, Szymanski S, et al
Choice architecture in physician–patient communication: a mixed-methods assessments of physicians’ competency
BMJ Quality & Safety 2021;30:362-371.

Publication history

  • Received June 16, 2020
  • Revised November 21, 2020
  • Accepted December 11, 2020
  • First published January 5, 2021.
Online issue publication 
January 09, 2022

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.