You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Nurses and nursing support matter: interpreting the evidence
  1. Jack Needleman1,
  2. Patricia W Stone2
  1. 1 Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  2. 2 Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York City, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jack Needleman, Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; needlema{at}ucla.edu

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010830

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    To the editors,

    In their editorial commenting on our paper ‘Association of registered nurse and nursing support staffing with inpatient hospital mortality’,1 Aiken and Sloane present our study results, conclusions and implications as if we examined the impact of substituting nursing support staff for professional nurses or registered nurses (RNs). We did not examine substitution of support staff for RNs (commonly called skill mix) in this study and, as Aiken and Sloane acknowledge, we stated our findings should not be interpreted to mean that nursing aides can safely substitute for RNs. Nonetheless, Aiken and Sloane discuss our current paper as though it is about …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @JackNeedleman

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.